Investigating 24-Hour Urine Expected Ranges of Non-Kidney Stone Formers: an EAU Endourology Research Group Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Noble, K.; Glubb, A.; Roy, P.; Howard, J.; Tzelves, L.; Yuen, S.; Cook, P.; Somani, B.; Fuster, D.; Ferraro, P. M.; Curhan, G.; Howles, S. A.; Sayer, J. A.; Kavanagh, O.; Geraghty, R.
Show abstract
Background and Objective: There is substantial variation in reference ranges for 24-hour urine collections, leading to diagnostic uncertainty. We aimed to curate robust evidence for expected ranges of 24-hour urine collections in the non-kidney stone forming population. Methods: We performed a systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024590784) of healthy adults without kidney stone disease undergoing 24-hour urine collections. Each component was meta-analysed in R, stratified by age, sex and ancestry, meta-regression and sensitivity analyses for study design, collection completeness and bias. An explicit eight-branch decision framework selected the recommended analysis per component. Expected ranges were derived from the pooled SD (95% interval); evidence was quantified by GRADE. Key Findings and Limitations: Seventy-two articles were included (10,284 participants). Expected ranges (mmol / 24 h unless stated): volume 1.0-2.5L, calcium 1.9-6.2, oxalate 0.2-0.6 (men) / 0.2-0.4 (women), urate 2.0-5.1(men)/2.3-3.5(women), pH 5.6-6.3, citrate 1.2-4.5, creatinine 12.2-16.3(men)/7.2-12.6(women), phosphate 19-26, sodium 98-253, potassium 28-77, magnesium 3.1-4.8, ammonium 28-46(men)/20-40(women), chloride 84-218, sulphate 17-26(men)/7-30(women), urea 234-445. Principal limitations were: high between-study heterogeneity (I-squared>95% for most components) and assay/laboratory variability (most marked for citrate and potassium). Conclusions and Clinical Implications: This is the first study to attempt a robust characterization of 24-hour urine expected ranges using meta-analysis. Six of the derived expected ranges (pH, oxalate, magnesium, sulphate, urate, creatinine) were broadly concordant with existing reference ranges, providing an evidence base for those specific components.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Chronic Kidney Disease and Acute Kidney Injury Involvement in COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 93%
- Mapping the role of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and its receptors in chronic kidney disease- a scoping review protocol 93%
- Incidence and risk factors of kidney impairment on patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk factors for renal stone development in adults with primary hyperparathyroidism: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 96%
- Non-Invasive Magnetic resonance imaging Biomarkers to evaLuatE histology-proven kidney fibrosis in Chronic Kidney Disease (NIMBLE-CKD): an observational cohort study protocol 92%
- ‘Self-Management Intervention through Lifestyle Education for Kidney health’ (the SMILE-K study): protocol for a single-blind longitudinal randomised control trial with nested pilot study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Laboratory diagnostic of acute kidney injury and its progression: risk of underdiagnosis in female and elderly patients 90%
- Procalcitonin to Predict Severity of Acute Cholangitis and Need for Urgent Biliary Decompression: Systematic Scoping Review 90%
- Evaluating the performance of the WHO international reference standard for osteoporosis diagnosis in postmenopausal women of varied polygenic score and race 89%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.