Back

Investigating 24-Hour Urine Expected Ranges of Non-Kidney Stone Formers: an EAU Endourology Research Group Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Noble, K.; Glubb, A.; Roy, P.; Howard, J.; Tzelves, L.; Yuen, S.; Cook, P.; Somani, B.; Fuster, D.; Ferraro, P. M.; Curhan, G.; Howles, S. A.; Sayer, J. A.; Kavanagh, O.; Geraghty, R.

2026-09-20 urology
10.64898/2026.09.17.26363294 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and Objective: There is substantial variation in reference ranges for 24-hour urine collections, leading to diagnostic uncertainty. We aimed to curate robust evidence for expected ranges of 24-hour urine collections in the non-kidney stone forming population. Methods: We performed a systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024590784) of healthy adults without kidney stone disease undergoing 24-hour urine collections. Each component was meta-analysed in R, stratified by age, sex and ancestry, meta-regression and sensitivity analyses for study design, collection completeness and bias. An explicit eight-branch decision framework selected the recommended analysis per component. Expected ranges were derived from the pooled SD (95% interval); evidence was quantified by GRADE. Key Findings and Limitations: Seventy-two articles were included (10,284 participants). Expected ranges (mmol / 24 h unless stated): volume 1.0-2.5L, calcium 1.9-6.2, oxalate 0.2-0.6 (men) / 0.2-0.4 (women), urate 2.0-5.1(men)/2.3-3.5(women), pH 5.6-6.3, citrate 1.2-4.5, creatinine 12.2-16.3(men)/7.2-12.6(women), phosphate 19-26, sodium 98-253, potassium 28-77, magnesium 3.1-4.8, ammonium 28-46(men)/20-40(women), chloride 84-218, sulphate 17-26(men)/7-30(women), urea 234-445. Principal limitations were: high between-study heterogeneity (I-squared>95% for most components) and assay/laboratory variability (most marked for citrate and potassium). Conclusions and Clinical Implications: This is the first study to attempt a robust characterization of 24-hour urine expected ranges using meta-analysis. Six of the derived expected ranges (pH, oxalate, magnesium, sulphate, urate, creatinine) were broadly concordant with existing reference ranges, providing an evidence base for those specific components.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.