Back

Full-Field Ultrasound Time-Harmonic Elastography Quantifies Task-Dependent Thoracolumbar Fascia and Multifidus Mechanics During Back Extension

Kurz, E.; Meyer, T.; Schwesig, R.; Delank, S.; Sack, I.; Aghamiry, H. S.

2026-09-20 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.09.17.26363289 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose: Ultrasound time-harmonic elastography (THE) uses continuous multifrequency vibration and standard-frame-rate ultrasound to generate full-field mechanical maps. We tested whether THE concurrently resolves task-dependent responses in the thin thoracolumbar fascia (TLF) and deeper multifidus muscle (MFM) during back extension. Methods: Eighteen healthy adults (9 female and 9 male; age 19.4 +/- 1.9 years) underwent multifrequency THE (60-80 Hz; 100 frames/s) at rest and during active back extension. Shear wave speed (SWS) and penetration rate (PR), an attenuation-sensitive measure, were quantified in manually defined TLF and MFM regions. Four within-tissue contrasts were tested using paired t tests with Holm adjustment; between-tissue, superficial-tissue-thickness, and sex analyses were exploratory. Results: Back extension increased SWS in the TLF (0.43 +/- 0.43 m/s; dz = 0.99) and MFM (0.62 +/- 0.23 m/s; dz = 2.73) and decreased PR in the TLF (-1.01 +/- 0.54 m/s; dz = -1.88) and MFM (-1.20 +/- 0.51 m/s; dz = -2.34); all Holm-adjusted p < 0.001. The SWS increase was 0.19 m/s greater in MFM than TLF (95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.38 m/s; unadjusted p = 0.042), whereas PR changes did not differ between tissues (p = 0.233). Conclusion: THE simultaneously captured spatially resolved, task-dependent responses in adjacent fascial and muscle tissues using standard-frame-rate acquisition. The findings establish biomechanical sensitivity in healthy adults and support further validation with standardized loading, repeatability testing, and comparison with conventional shear wave elastography.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.