Back

Supportive Strides: Co-designing Community-Based Walking Programs with Embedded Socialisation and Peer Support for People after Stroke

Fini, N.; Cahill, P.; Beh, B. A.; Suttie, L.; Gallant, D.; Martel, A.; Mateo-Babiano, I.; Marck, C. H.; Hayward, K. S.; Ramage, E.

2026-09-20 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.64898/2026.09.17.26362966 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose: To co-design a community-based walking program that incorporates social connection to improve physical activity post-stroke. Methods: A four-stage Integrated Knowledge Translation approach was used. Stage 1: research team (2 stroke survivors, 8 professionals) defined research questions, scope and plan. Stage 2: workshops held with stroke survivors, carers, and health and design professionals to identify important program principles. Stage 3: research team used a Nominal Group Technique to make key decisions and develop the program. Stage 4: program presented to participants; feedback gathered and adaptations made. Workshop findings were iteratively analysed and summarised during sessions. Results: Twenty-six participants were recruited across stages 2 and 4 (12 stroke survivors, 2 carers, 12 professionals). Key program principles identified in Stage 2 were social support, inclusive environment, motivational support, co-ordination and administrative support. The Supportive Strides program was co-designed to incorporate these principles. Program elements included accessible outdoor walking routes, pre-walk coffee and social connection, peer-support, online group chat, milestone celebrations, and a safety checklist. Following Stage 4 participant feedback, adaptations were incorporated e.g., simpler screening process, include more walking route information. Conclusions: The co-designed Supportive Strides community-based walking program is ready for testing to improve physical activity and social connection after stroke.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.