Back

Transcriptomic and Machine-Learning Prioritization of OCEL1 in Low Bone Mineral Density With Multivariable cis-MR

Yao, J.; Zhong, Q.

2026-09-20 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.09.16.26363200 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction Low bone mineral density (BMD) is associated with altered bone remodeling and osteoimmune regulation. We aimed to prioritize transcript-level signals supported across human expression cohorts and evaluate their attribution within local cis-regulatory architecture. Materials and Methods Nominal differential-expression signals from GSE56815 were restricted with a predefined 25-term MSigDB thematic library. Features measurable in GSE56815 and GSE2208 underwent linear SVM ranking, LASSO, and XGBoost selection, followed by cross-cohort transcriptomic assessment. OCEL1 was examined in a four-exposure locus-aware CisMRBEEX model with NR2F6, MRPL34, BABAM1, eQTLGen cis-eQTLs, heel eBMD GWAS statistics, and UKBB337K LD. Results The expression screen identified 2,568 genes at nominal P<0.05; thematic restriction retained 190 candidates and 107 common features entered machine learning. Linear SVM, LASSO, and XGBoost retained 24, 18, and 9 genes and converged on CPNE1, EZR, and OCEL1. Only OCEL1 showed concordant expression direction with P<0.05 in both cohorts. In the primary 268-variant four-exposure model, OCEL1 was positively associated with heel eBMD ({beta}=0.010293, SE=0.004107, 95% CI 0.002244-0.018342, P=0.01220, PIP=0.4001; conditional coefficient on the standardized analysis scale); BABAM1 retained an oppositely directed component. The no-palindromic reconstruction remained positive with wider uncertainty ({beta}=0.007652, P=0.06739). Conclusion Convergent transcriptomic evidence prioritized OCEL1, whose conditional genetic-expression component was positively associated with heel eBMD after local shared cis regulation was modeled. Keywords: low bone mineral density; OCEL1; transcriptomics; machine learning; cis-Mendelian randomization

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.