Emergent catch bonds from slip-like contacts: cooperative force-driven proofreading at receptor--ligand interfaces
Iribas, J.; Garc\'{\i}a-S\'anchez, M.; Faro, J.; Castro, M.
Show abstract
Mechanical forces modulate receptor-ligand kinetics, sometimes producing the so-called catch bond: a tensile force strengthens the bond, whereas in most cases engagement time is reduced (a slip bond). Multiple phenomenological models reproduce catch-slip behavior between receptors and ligands, primarily by positing how the reaction's free-energy landscape changes under applied forces. In this paper, we show that distinct microscopic mechanisms often collapse into mathematically equivalent multi-exponential forms. This operational equivalence makes them difficult to distinguish (or even falsify) based solely on bond survival curves. We expose this mathematical equivalence and the validity regimes of these reductions and introduce \emph{c}ooperative \emph{f}orce-driven \emph{p}roof\emph{r}eading (CFPR), a network-level mechanism where pulling geometry enables contact-zone reorganization and additional nucleation of residue binding contributions, generating emergent catch-like responses from individually slip-like residue binding contributions. Our model can incorporate data from molecular dynamics simulations to predict, in advance, whether catch-slip will be present in a system and under what conditions, making it a predictive tool that complements experimental data.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Mechanics of allostery: contrasting the induced fit and population shift scenarios 95%
- Intrinsic disorder in the T cell receptor creates cooperativity and controls ZAP70 binding 95%
- Molecular model of the nuclear pore complex reveals a thermoreversible FG-network with distinct territories occupied by different FG motifs 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.