Limitations of renal arterial hemodynamic measures as candidate biomarkers of renal sympathetic innervation
Dettmer, C.; Schiller, A. M.; Zucker, I. H.; Chatzizisis, Y. S.; Wang, H.; Pellegrino, P. R.
Show abstract
Introduction: The key role of maladaptive renal sympathetic activation in hypertension has led to the development of catheter-based renal denervation therapies. Unfortunately, the lack of practical physiological biomarkers impairs patient selection and prevents intraprocedural feedback for renal denervation. Methods: We tested whether renal arterial hemodynamic measures and the beat-to-beat variability of these measures reflect renal sympathetic innervation in two tightly controlled preclinical models of renal denervation. Bilateral renal hemodynamic data were obtained from ten conscious unilaterally denervated rabbits and ten anesthetized unilaterally denervated pigs that subsequently underwent stepwise catheter-based radiofrequency denervation of the contralateral kidney. Renal arterial mechanics were assessed by quantification of wave speed and input impedance modulus and phase shift. Variability was quantified as the within-recording standard deviation of each metric when measured on a beat-to-beat basis. Results: Wave speed trended down after surgical denervation in rabbits (P = 0.054) but not swine (P = 0.57); wave speed variability was unchanged in both models. Renal arterial input impedance modulus was not significantly affected by surgical denervation. Surgical renal denervation increased input impedance phase shift in rabbits (P = 0.0048) but not in swine (P = 0.85). The beat-to-beat variability of modulus did not differ significantly between innervated and surgically denervated kidneys in either species. Surgical renal denervation decreased phase shift variability in swine (P = 0.0048) but not rabbits. The difference in phase shift variability between kidneys in swine was eliminated after a single round of branch-vessel ablation (P = 0.42). Discussion: Renal arterial wave speed, input impedance, and their beat-to-beat variability did not consistently or dose-dependently reflect renal sympathetic innervation in these models. These findings argue against their use as direct physiological surrogates for renal sympathetic outflow.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Sympathetic Vasomotion Reflects Catheter-based Radiofrequency Renal Denervation 97%
- Coarctation duration and severity predict risk of hypertension precursors in a preclinical model and hypertensive status among patients 92%
- Deficiency of complement C3a and C5a receptors does not prevent angiotensin II–induced hypertension and hypertensive end-organ damage 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunosuppressive regimens based on Cyclophospamide or Calcineurin inhibitors: Comparison of their effect in the long term outcome of Primary Membranous Nephropathy 91%
- Development of a Novel Index to Characterise Arterial Dynamics Using Ultrasound Imaging 91%
- Translation of Immunomodulatory Therapy to Treat Chronic Heart Failure: Preclinical Studies to First in Human 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The assessment of cortical hemodynamical responses induced by tubuloglomerular feedback using in vivo imaging 93%
- Potential Relationship Between eGFR cystatin C /eGFR creatinine -ratio and Glomerular Basement Membrane Thickness in Diabetic Kidney Disease 91%
- Sex Differences in Middle Cerebral Artery Reactivity and Hemodynamics Independent from Changes in Systemic Arterial Stiffness in Adult Sprague-Dawley Rats 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cardiac Output During Exercise: Thermodilution versus Direct Fick 93%
- iCPET calculator: a web-based application to standardize the calculation of alpha distensibility in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension 93%
- Incident Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Influence of Right Ventricular Dilatation and Reduced Right Atrial Function 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.