Tracing high transductive cohort AUC to same-site supervision in a site-aware population GNN for multisite fMRI
Wan, K.; Chen, Z.; Liu, G.; Yu, B.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, F.; Zhong, N.; Kuai, H.
Show abstract
Population-graph models can use cohort-level context, complicating interpretation of strong multisite neuroimaging performance. We investigated which information pathways accounted for high transductive cohort discrimination in a site-aware heterogeneous population graph neural network for autism classification. Using a frozen ABIDE-I cohort (871 participants, 20 sites) and evaluation protocol, we applied controlled graph, feature, supervision, and architecture interventions to a clean-room re-implementation across C-PAC and NIAK preprocessing pipelines. Cohort out-of-fold AUC was approximately 0.94. A site-only graph retained similarly high discrimination (0.948 versus 0.941 for the full model), with no statistically significant difference detected. Removing same-site supervision under a site-wise intervention reduced AUC to 0.480, whereas a supervision-budget control retaining same-site supervision achieved 0.921. Among the alternative heads evaluated, the high cohort AUC was observed only with the sex-heterogeneous dual-channel head; a canonical topology-only Parisot-GCN did not reproduce it. A demographic classifier using site, sex, and their interaction achieved a best pooled AUC of 0.51. Under leave-one-site-out evaluation, AUC was 0.522 for C-PAC and 0.532 for NIAK, with confidence intervals including 0.5 and no clear evidence of unseen-site discrimination; an imaging-only reference achieved 0.653 and 0.588. Because leave-one-site-out evaluation jointly changes supervision availability, target-site topology, and training-domain composition, the decrease cannot be attributed to a single factor. These findings distinguish cohort-visible transductive performance from unseen-site generalization and motivate explicit site-only, no-graph, and site-held-out controls.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Brain functional network connectivity interpolation characterizes the neuropsychiatric continuum and heterogeneity 93%
- Alignment massive of auditory individual artificial networks with fMRI brain data leads to generalizable improvements in brain encoding and downstream tasks 92%
- Level Up the Brain! Novel PCA Method Reveals Key Neuroplastic Refinements in Action Video Gamers 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinally stable, brain-based predictive models mediate the relationships between childhood cognition and socio-demographic, psychological and genetic factors 93%
- Predicting sex, age, general cognition and mental health with machine learning on brain structural connectomes 92%
- Big Data, Small Bias: Harmonizing Diffusion MRI-Based Structural Connectomes to Mitigate Site-Related Bias in Data Integration 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Insights from an autism imaging biomarker challenge: promises and threats to biomarker discovery 93%
- Atlas-independent brain connectome analysis at voxel-level granularity: graph convolutional networks for etiology classification in newborns 93%
- Functional Annotation of Human Cognitive States using Deep Graph Convolution 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Subset of Cortical Areas Exhibit Adult-like Functional Network Patterns in Early Childhood 92%
- Building Functional Connectivity Neuromarkers of Behavioral Self-Regulation in Children with and without Autism Spectrum Disorder 91%
- Precision Functional Neuroimaging Reveals Individually Specific Auditory Responses in Infants 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Functional and diffusion MRI reveal the functional and structural basis of infants' noxious-evoked brain activity 93%
- Functional Connectivity Development along the Sensorimotor-Association Axis Enhances the Cortical Hierarchy 92%
- Motion Impact Score for Detecting Spurious Brain-Behavior Associations 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.