Back

A Unified 3D Generative Model for Synthesizable Structure-Based Drug Design

Igashov, I.; Schneuing, A.; Dobbelstein, A. W.; Morozova, I.; Neeser, R. M.; Zielinski, K.; Abriata, L. A.; Petruzzella, A. S.; Pavel Iosub, D. R.; Gampp, O.; Lyubimov, A. Y.; Elizarova, E.; Ferrara, I.; Sousa, P. M. F.; Lemos, A. R.; Testori, F.; Miranda Herrera, P. A.; Kanis, L.; Schmidt, J.; Braza, M. K. E.; Amaro, R. E.; Thoma, N.; Ferraris, D. M.; Riek, R.; Fraser, J. S.; Schwaller, P.; Bronstein, M.; Correia, B.

2026-09-18 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.09.15.751537 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Traditional screening-based drug discovery is inherently limited by the astronomical scale of the chemical space. Generative modelling offers a compelling alternative to the classical search paradigm and enables rational, bottom-up design of novel and target-specific small molecules. However, its impact has been hampered by challenges in synthetic accessibility of the designed compounds and lack of large-scale experimental validation. Here, we introduce LDDM (Large Drug Discovery Model), a generative framework that supports a range of drug discovery tasks, including constrained and unconstrained docking, fragment linking and growing, and de novo design. We further introduce a programmable design algorithm that enables accurate design of synthetically accessible compounds satisfying various fine-grained objectives. We experimentally validated the designed or optimised ligands for five therapeutically relevant protein targets. In all cases, LDDM achieved high success rates, allowing us to identify molecules with confirmed binding affinity while synthesizing only a small number of generated compounds. The best designs were structurally characterised through NMR spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography, demonstrating high prediction accuracy. Overall, LDDM provides a scalable and flexible platform for the rapid and tailored design of small molecules and non-natural peptides for therapeutic applications.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.