Back

PERADS.net: Automated PE-RADS Grading with Named Anatomic Localization and Right-to-Left Ventricular Ratio Measurement on CT Pulmonary Angiography

Lanza, E.; Catapano, F.; Lisi, C.; D'Orazio, F.; Levi, R.; Laghi, A.

2026-09-16 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.09.15.26363142 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose: To develop an automated pipeline (PERADS.net) that segments acute pulmonary embolism on CT pulmonary angiography, assigns a Pulmonary Embolism Reporting and Data System (PE-RADS) grade with named anatomic localization, and measures the right-to-left ventricular (RV/LV) diameter ratio, and to assess radiologist agreement. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, 120 CT pulmonary angiograms (70 peripheral, 35 central, 15 negative) from the public RSNA Pulmonary Embolism CT dataset were analyzed. A two-channel five-fold nnU-Net ensemble segmented the embolus; the pulmonary arterial tree was reduced to a branching graph, and the grade was set by the most proximal level with at least 1% of embolic volume. Three radiologists, blinded to the algorithm-assigned grade, independently assigned grades and rated RV/LV plausibility. Agreement was assessed with percent agreement and Cohen or Fleiss kappa on five-grade and grouped scales (grade 0 versus 1-2 versus 3-4). The automated ratio was compared with the dataset's binary RV/LV label in 2119 examinations. Results: Agreement between the algorithm and three-radiologist consensus (n = 119) was 60.5% (kappa, 0.38) for individual grades and 90.8% (kappa, 0.74; 95% CI: 0.59, 0.87) for the grouped scale; 34 of 47 discordant examinations fell within grades 3-4. As a fourth reader, the algorithm matched grouped-scale interobserver agreement (mean kappa, 0.62 versus 0.67). Radiologists showed no agreement rating RV/LV plausibility as favorable or incorrect (Fleiss kappa, -0.00), whereas the automated ratio agreed with the external label (kappa, 0.49), overestimating strain 3.1:1. Conclusion: Automated PE-RADS grading agreed with radiologist consensus comparably to a fourth reader on the grouped scale.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.