MetScore and classical-basal subtype intersect to define chemotherapy response and tumor microenvironment architecture in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
Preston, R. E.; Huang, H.; Hall, M. A.; Grewal, U. S.; Abdilleh, K.; Doss, S.; Moffitt, R.; Alese, O. B.; Lesinski, G. B.; Handler, J. S.
Show abstract
Background Transcriptomic heterogeneity in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is conventionally modeled along a single classical-basal axis, but this framework incompletely explains clinical behavior. We hypothesized that MetScore, a single-sample measure of metastatic colonization potential, defines a complementary axis. Objective To determine how MetScore and classical-basal identity jointly shape PDAC biology and clinical outcomes. Design We integrated RNA sequencing, DNA sequencing, clinical, and digital pathology data from 512 tumor biopsies from 510 patients in the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network Know Your Tumor real-world cohort. We assessed associations with biopsy site, survival, chemotherapy response, and tumor microenvironment composition; validated metastatic discrimination in an independent cohort; and examined cancer cell-intrinsic drug sensitivity in vitro. Results MetScore distinguished metastatic from primary biopsies, a finding validated externally. High MetScore and basal identity were independently associated with inferior survival. High MetScore and classical identity were each associated with preferential response to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based rather than gemcitabine-based therapy, with the strongest enrichment for 5-FU responses among classical/MetScore-high patients. In vitro drug-sensitivity experiments did not recapitulate the clinical treatment-response pattern, motivating investigation of cancer cell-extrinsic factors. Transcriptomic deconvolution and histopathologic machine learning-based cell annotation demonstrated that high-MetScore and basal states converged on macrophage/monocyte enrichment but diverged in their associations with cancer-associated fibroblasts. Conclusion Integrating MetScore with classical-basal identity establishes a two-axis framework that better explains metastatic behavior, prognosis, treatment response, and microenvironmental composition than the conventional one-axis model and provides a clinically testable strategy for transcriptome-guided patient stratification.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- TET2 drives 5hmc marking of GATA6 and epigenetically defines pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma transcriptional subtypes 92%
- Targeting DNA damage response and Replication Stress in Pancreatic Cancer 92%
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Treatment Response using Diagnostic Histopathology 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- GATA4 and GATA6 loss-of-expression is associated with extinction of the classical programme and poor outcome in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma 93%
- Quantifying and mitigating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on outcomes in colorectal cancer 92%
- A GATA6-centered gene regulatory network involving HNFs and ΔNp63 controls plasticity and immune escape in pancreatic cancer 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Convergence for Inactivation of TGFβ Signaling Is a Common Feature of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer 95%
- Netrin G1 promotes pancreatic tumorigenesis through cancer associated fibroblastdriven nutritional support and immunosuppression 92%
- Tumor Explants Elucidate a Cascade of Paracrine SHH, WNT, and VEGF Signals Driving Pancreatic Cancer Angiosuppression 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Reveals the Effects of Chemotherapy on Human Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma and its Tumor Microenvironment 93%
- Angiogenic and Immune Predictors of Neoadjuvant Axitinib Response in Renal Cell Carcinoma with Venous Tumour Thrombus 92%
- Single-cell analysis of patient-derived PDAC organoids reveals cell state heterogeneity and a conserved developmental hierarchy 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.