Back

NeuralRNN: a unified framework for recurrent neural network methods in cognitive neuroscience

Chen, H.; Ding, N.

2026-09-21 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.09.14.751453 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) provide a central tool in neuroscience to optimize cognitive tasks and reconstruct dynamical systems. Around these two paradigms, many RNN model variants have been tailored to capture specific computations of the brain. In practice, however, this methodological diversity remains difficult to exploit, because different paradigms and model variants are mostly implemented in idiosyncratic, study-specific code. Here we introduce NeuralRNN, an open-source Python framework that unifies these paradigms and model variants in a general-purpose pipeline. NeuralRNN brings task optimization, dynamical system reconstruction, and biological constraints into a single objective interface. It also provides an integrated and extensible model library spanning generic, structure-constrained, gain-modulated, and gated RNNs. Furthermore, data, models, and training are constructed through a shared automated pipeline and are equipped with a suite of tools for dynamical systems analysis. Together, NeuralRNN lowers the barrier to implementing, comparing, and extending RNN methods in neuroscience.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
25.9%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Neuroinformatics
○ 46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
Similar papers in this journal
3
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.1%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Nature Machine Intelligence
○ 70 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.7%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
○ 41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.9%
7
Human Brain Mapping
○ 329 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
Similar papers in this journal
8
Nature Neuroscience
○ 252 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
9
NeuroImage
○ 903 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.3%
10
eneuro
● 439 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
11
Network Neuroscience
● 126 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
12
Neuron
○ 337 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.7%
14
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
15
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.6%
16
PLOS Biology
● 486 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
17
Nature Computational Science
○ 55 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
18
Cerebral Cortex
◐ 396 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
○ 60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
21
Imaging Neuroscience
● 282 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
22
Cell Reports
○ 1498 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
23
Scientific Data
○ 209 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
24
Aperture Neuro
● 20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.