A Thermodynamic Framework Linking Black Box Growth models with Genome Scale Metabolite models
PUJIANG, J.; Wang, D.; Shi, H.
Show abstract
Genome scale metabolic models provide detailed mechanistic descriptions of cellular metabolism, whereas black box growth models capture physiological behaviors using a small number of effective parameters. However, the quantitative relationship between these two modeling scales remains unclear. In this study, we develop a thermodynamic framework that connects black box growth models with thermodynamically constrained genome scale metabolic models. By linking black box model parameters with Gibbs energy dissipation rates derived from genome scale metabolic models, we demonstrate that coarse grained physiological descriptions can be obtained from detailed metabolic networks while preserving their thermodynamic foundation. We validate this framework in both Escherichia coli and yeast, showing that the resulting black box models reproduce key physiological behaviors, including growth dynamics, biomass yield, and overflow metabolism observed experimentally. Our results indicate that black box growth models and genome scale metabolic models are connected through shared thermodynamic constraints, revealing a consistent thermodynamic basis across different levels of metabolic description. This framework provides a general approach for integrating detailed metabolic networks with simple black box growth models and enables efficient multiscale modeling of cellular metabolism.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficiency, accuracy and robustness of probability generating function based parameter inference method for stochastic biochemical reactions 95%
- Genome-scale metabolic modelling when changes in environmental conditions affect biomass composition 95%
- Metabolic reprogramming dynamics in tumor spheroids: Insights from a multicellular, multiscale model 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.