Task-Specific Quality Gating for Retinal Optical Coherence Tomography B-Scans: Learned Representations Over Scalar Metrics in Choroid Segmentation
Hiras, A.; Gadari, A.; Jayaraman, A.; Mankumare, A. S.; Mynampati, A.; Chhablani, J. K.; Bollepalli, S. C.; Vupparaboina, K. K.
Show abstract
Automated segmentation of Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) images is a critical component of structural biomarker extraction for retinal diagnostics. Deep learning models achieve state-of-the-art performance on controlled datasets, yet exhibit unpredictable failures on real-world data. Current quality gates rely on device-reported scan quality scores, which have been shown to be unreliable predictors of segmentation performance. We define scan quality in a task-specific sense, that is, whether a given B-scan will yield a reliable segmentation from a particular trained model. Under this definition, we systematically evaluate No-Reference Image Quality Assessment (NR-IQA) metrics, general-purpose pretrained representations, and domain-specific pretrained representations as alternative quality gates. We use choroid segmentation as the prototype task, with a dataset of 6,076 OCT B-scans from 80 subjects. These quality gate candidates are evaluated at three levels: scalar metrics (BRISQUE, NIQE, PIQE, SNR, PSNR), supervised linear probing, and unsupervised partitioning (K-Means) of feature vectors and learned representations. All scalar NR-IQA metrics proved inadequate (|r| < 0.20). General-purpose pretrained representations (EfficientNet-B0, ResNet-50, ViT-B/16) outperform NR-IQA, achieving ROC-AUC up to 0.77, indicating that learned representations are better suited to task-specific quality gating than hand-crafted scalar statistics. Retinal foundation models (FMs) further improve performance: RETFound, an OCT-specific FM, achieves ROC-AUC of approximately 0.81. Unsupervised K-Means partitioning of the embeddings recovers the same hierarchy geometrically: only the two retinal foundation models produce quality-aligned clusters that exceed a patient-level permutation null, while NR-IQA and general-purpose pretrained feature spaces do not, suggesting that domain-specific pretraining provides an additional benefit beyond general-purpose learned representations.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical Validation of Saliency Maps for Understanding Deep Neural Networks in Ophthalmology 93%
- ViFIT-assisted Histopathology: From H&E Style Standardization to Virtual Fiber Image Transformation 93%
- A Framework for Falsifiable Explanations of Machine Learning Models with an Application in Computational Pathology 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Interpretable Detection of Epiretinal Membrane from Optical Coherence Tomography with Deep Neural Networks 94%
- Modeling rod and cone photoreceptor cell survival in vivo using optical coherence tomography 92%
- Circular functional analysis of OCT data for precise identification of structural phenotypes in the eye 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantification of Fundus Autofluorescence Features in a Molecularly Characterized Cohort of More Than 3500 Inherited Retinal Disease Patients from the United Kingdom 91%
- Artificial intelligence to facilitate clinical trial recruitment in age-related macular degeneration 91%
- A Computational Framework for Intraoperative Pupil Analysis in Cataract Surgery 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.