Calibrated per-pixel uncertainty for low-dose paediatric chest-radiograph denoising at no fidelity cost
Mengistu, S. T.; Flouris, K.
Show abstract
Background. Deep denoisers restore low-dose chest radiographs but emit a single point estimate with no indication of where the output is reliable, so a confident-looking reconstruction can be locally wrong. In paediatric radiography, where the radiation-dose imperative is sharpest, we ask whether a per-pixel uncertainty map can be attached at no meaningful cost to reconstruction quality. Methods. We develop PP-VAE-Hformer, a hybrid convolution-transformer denoiser with a variational-autoencoder bottleneck (epistemic uncertainty map) and a heteroscedastic dual head (aleatoric map), and run a 19-arm ablation isolating five composite-loss terms on Poisson-Gaussian-degraded paediatric chest radiographs (Kermany collection; 624-image held-out test set), against eight discriminative baselines retrained on identical data and noise. Calibration is assessed by reliability diagrams and post-hoc-scaling; comparisons use Bonferroni-corrected Welch tests with Cohens d as the primary discriminant. Results. A heteroscedastic negative-log-likelihood (NLL) objective buys a calibrated aleatoric map for 1.2 dB PSNR, which two-stage fine-tuning recovers to a statistically indistinguishable 0.010 dB. For the variational variant the Kullback-Leibler (KL) annealing schedule, not the bottleneck itself, is decisive: cyclic annealing closes a 1.10 dB gap over posterior-collapsing linear warmup. Predicted uncertainty tracks realised error (Pearson r > 0.8) with an optimal recalibration scale within 1% of unity. A matched-severity cross-degradation test shows this calibration is model-circular, however: at equal severity the aleatoric map becomes modestly (8-16%, a lower bound) over-confident once the noise model changes, and the Monte-Carlo epistemic map is a weaker error predictor that does not compensate. We additionally document a previously unreported destructive interaction between structural-similarity and Sobel-edge supervision at literature-default weights. Conclusions. A calibrated per-pixel uncertainty map can be attached to a paediatric low-dose CXR denoiser at effectively no reconstruction cost. Its near-perfect calibration is tied to the trained (inverse-crime) noise model, and the Monte-Carlo epistemic map does not reliably substitute where the aleatoric map fails, so an architecture-independent uncertainty estimate (e.g. deep ensembling), a blinded reader study, and real low-dose data are the immediate next steps. Keywords. image denoising; uncertainty quantification; calibration; variational autoen-coder; paediatric chest radiography; low-dose imaging
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Quality Assurance Assessment of Intra-Acquisition Diffusion-Weighted and T2-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Registration and Contour Propagation for Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy 91%
- Phase Recognition in Contrast-Enhanced CT Scans based on Deep Learning and Random Sampling 90%
- Necessity and Impact of Specialization of Large Foundation Model for Medical Segmentation Tasks 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tracking And Predicting COVID-19 Radiological Trajectory Using Deep Learning On Chest X-Rays: Initial Accuracy Testing 92%
- Dual Adversarial Deconfounding Autoencoder for joint batch-effects removal from multi-center and multi-scanner radiomics data 92%
- Toward Understanding COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Deep-learning-based Approach for Severity Analysis and Monitoring the Disease 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated quality control of T1-weighted brain MRI scans for clinical research: methods comparison and design of a quality prediction classifier 89%
- FONDUE: Robust resolution-invariant denoising of MR Images using Nested UNets 89%
- BrainQCNet: a Deep Learning attention-based model for the automated detection of artifacts in brain structural MRI scans. 88%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.