Calibration and processing sensitivity of time-embedded three-dimensional electrocardiographic descriptors: a two-dataset benchmark
Bermejo Valdes, A. J.
Show abstract
Time-embedded electrocardiographic descriptors combine high-order derivatives in nonlinear ratios, making their numerical calibration essential. We analyzed 200 LUDB participants (1,748 QRS windows) and a fixed external sample of 1,000 PTB-XL participants (9,735 windows). Four prespecified derivative operators were evaluated at three nominal Butterworth cutoffs; a fifth, regularized operator was added post hoc. Extensions added transfer functions, matched response crossings and a Gaussian transient with exact derivatives. The expanded calibration comprised 1,005 mathematical signal/noise realizations. At 150 Hz, spectral differentiation (SPEC) increased external participant-level mean absolute torsion by a median 78.97% relative to successive finite differences (FD; 95% confidence interval 77.39-80.53). Reducing the cutoff to 40 Hz yielded weak rank preservation: Spearman correlations were 0.045 for SPEC and 0.099 for FD. Matching each derivative's first normalized -3-dB crossing at 20 Hz reduced the external SPEC-FD median difference to 0.016%, but introduced 4.26-4.70% noiseless error on the Gaussian transient. Agreement was therefore not accuracy against the known target. For the Gaussian transient with 20-microvolt noise, relative root mean squared errors at 150 Hz were 719.52% for SPEC and 99.96% for the regularizer; the latter error remained comparable to the target magnitude, and regularization also introduced noiseless bias. Almost-curvature approximated a normalized voltage slope under the specified coordinates and did not converge to classical curvature under reparametrization. Explicit transfer functions, absolute descriptor levels and analytic targets explain important processing effects while separating numerical agreement from clinical validity. No universally optimal estimator or diagnostic benefit is established.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Simple Models Versus Deep Learning in Detecting Low Ejection Fraction From The Electrocardiogram 94%
- Multimodal deep learning enhances diagnostic precision in left ventricular hypertrophy 93%
- Using ECG Machine Learning for Detection of Cardiovascular Disease in African American Men and Women: the Jackson Heart Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- BRAVEHEART: Open-source software for automated electrocardiographic and vectorcardiographic analysis 94%
- Digitizing ECG image: new fully automated method and open-source software code 93%
- Automated IntraVascular UltraSound Image Processing and Quantification of Coronary Artery Anomalies: The AIVUS-CAA software 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- T vector velocity: A new ECG biomarker for identifying drug effects on cardiac ventricular repolarization 94%
- Toward Automated Classification of Pathological Transcranial Doppler Waveform Morphology via Spectral Clustering 93%
- Rett syndrome severity estimation with the BioStamp nPoint using interactions between heart rate variability and body movement 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting Ventricular Tachycardia Circuits in Patients with Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy using Genotype-specific Heart Digital Twins 91%
- Assessing drug safety by identifying the axis of arrhythmia in cardiomyocyte electrophysiology 90%
- I-Spin live: An open-source software based on blind-source separation for real-time decoding of motor unit activity in humans 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.