Linking plant-soil feedback with resource competition to understand plant coexistence
Lyu, S.; Liu, X.; Alexander, J. M.
Show abstract
1. Plant-soil feedback (PSF) is increasingly recognized as an important mechanism influencing plant coexistence, but most studies have examined PSF in isolation under controlled conditions. Under natural conditions, PSF operates together with other processes such as resource competition, yet how these processes jointly shape plant coexistence across environmental gradients remains poorly understood. 2. We combined field and greenhouse experiments to assess the contribution of PSF to plant coexistence at low- and high-elevation sites in the Swiss Alps. In the field, we quantified total niche and fitness differences and predicted interaction outcomes for nine plant species pairs, integrating PSF, resource competition, and other processes. In a complementary greenhouse experiment, we used soil microbial communities conditioned during the field experiment to isolate PSF-driven niche and fitness differences for the same species pairs. 3. PSF alone generated strong fitness differences but weak niche differences in the greenhouse experiment, predominantly predicting competitive exclusion. Interaction outcomes predicted from PSF alone corresponded poorly with those in the field, suggesting that PSF in isolation poorly explain plant coexistence under natural conditions. Nevertheless, PSF-driven niche and fitness differences were related to those quantified in the field, which were likely driven largely by resource competition, suggesting that PSF may contribute to coexistence by reinforcing or counteracting other ecological processes. These relationships varied between elevations, highlighting the context dependence of PSF contributions to coexistence. 4. Synthesis. Our study shows that the impacts of plant-soil feedback on plant coexistence cannot be understood from their effects in isolation. Instead, their contribution depends on how they interact with other ecological processes and on the environmental context in which these processes operate. Together, our findings emphasize the need to move beyond studying PSF in isolation towards quantifying how it combines with other mechanisms that drives coexistence under natural conditions.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Testing for co-adaptation of plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a biodiversity experiment 94%
- Decomposition disentangled: a test of the multiple mechanisms by which nitrogen enrichment alters litter decomposition 91%
- Nitrogen niche partitioning between tropical legumes and grasses conditionally weakens under elevated CO2 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The biodiversity of plant-frugivore interactions: types, functions, and consequences 92%
- Whole plant community transplants across climates reveal total community stability due to large shifts in species assemblage 92%
- Seedling performance in a dioecious tree species is similar near female and male conspecific adults despite differences in colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatially variable competition contributes to mismatched responses of plant fitness and occurrence to environmental gradients 92%
- Transgenerational coexistence history attenuates negative direct interactions and strengthens facilitation 92%
- Functional traits predict species responses to environmental variation in a California grassland annual plant community 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.