Back

Reconstruction of FACS-partitioned Adaptive Immune Receptor Repertoires from FACS-partitioned B and T Cell Subsets

Zhao, H.; Morgan, A.; Yasuda, M.; Mirebrahim, H.; Schlecht, U.; McNamara, S.; Adachi, R.; Rubelt, F.; Kumar, D.; Utiramerur, S.; Arnaout, R.; Asgharian, H.

2026-09-19 immunology
10.64898/2026.09.13.746584 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Adaptive immune-receptor repertoire sequencing (AIRRseq) is crucial for understanding immune system diversity and its relationship to disease dynamics. Partitioning of total B and T cells into their major subsets with distinct immunological functions - IgM+ vs. class-switched B cells (IgG+ > IgA+) and CD4+ vs. CD8+ T cells, respectively - allows for AIRRseq-based analysis of the unique contributions of each compartment to the overall immune response, a major advantage over traditional bulk sequencing workflows. However, data from these subsets is not directly comparable with the vast majority of publicly available AIRRseq data, which comes from unfractionated B and T cells, an important incompatibility. Here we investigate computational methods for reconstructing complete AIRRseq repertoires from partitioned B and T cell subsets in diverse individuals. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were partitioned via positive selection of IgM+ B-cell subsets and CD4+ T cells using immunomagnetic beads; genomic DNA was then extracted and B- and T-cell receptors were sequenced. Four reconstruction methods are introduced and evaluated for concordance with matching unpartitioned repertoires to assess preservation of key repertoire characteristics. Results show that these methods enable accurate estimates of overall immune-repertoire diversity from B- and T-cell subsets in a way that simply pooling the sequence data from sub-repertoires cannot.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.