Stimulus predictability rather than inter-trial interval itself affects motor evoked potential amplitudes
Seifpour, S.; Haferkorn, N.; Vijayakumar, S.; Bergmann, T. O.
Show abstract
The inter-trial interval (ITI) of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can modulate motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude and may thus confound assessments of corticospinal excitability. We tested whether this effect depends on the ITI duration per se or the associated temporal predictability and whether intracortical inhibitory processes mediate these effects on. In 26 healthy participants, we recorded single-pulse MEPs and paired-pulse measures of short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI; 2-ms interstimulus interval) and long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI; 100-ms interstimulus interval) at ITIs of 2, 5, and 10 s. ITIs were presented in different Patterns, i.e., separate fixed blocks (FXD), randomly intermingled within blocks (RND), or randomly intermingled but auditorily cued at 950 ms pre-TMS (RNDC). MEPs showed significant effects of ITI, Pattern, and their interaction, being smaller at 2 s than at longer ITIs in FXD but not in RND and RNDC. However, RNDC produced marked MEP suppression across all ITI. SICI showed a Pattern x ITI interaction but no main effect of Pattern or between-pattern differences per ITI, whereas LICI showed complex Pattern x ITI interaction and both main effects. Notably, ITI affected SICI and LICI oppositely. While GABA-A-receptor mediated inhibition (SICI) showed an ITI dependency compatible with the ITI effects on single-pulse MEPs, it was unlikely mediating the predictability effects but may rather relate to an independent ITI driven suppression. In contrast, GABA-B-receptor mediated inhibition (LICI), was clearly modulated by predictability, but incompatible with the observed ITI effects on MEP amplitude. In summary, the effect of ITI duration on MEP amplitude seems to be largely explained by anticipatory suppression of corticospinal excitability based on the predictability of TMS pulses as derived from their temporal context, being easier for shorter and more regular ITIs and maximal for explicit cues immediately preceding the TMS pulse. SICI and LICI are modulated by ITI as well, with the latter affected by predictability, but neither can explain the observed predictability effects on single-pulse MEP amplitudes.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards domain-general predictive coding: Expected TMS excites the motor system less effectively than unexpected stimulation 95%
- The value of corticospinal excitability and intracortical inhibition in predicting motor skill improvement driven by action observation 93%
- Assessment of cortical excitability in awake rhesus macaques with transcranial magnetic stimulation: translational insights from recruitment curves 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Test-retest reliability of intrahemispheric dorsal premotor and primary motor cortex dual-site TMS connectivity measures 94%
- Probing the orientation specificity of excitatory and inhibitory circuitries in the primary motor cortex with multi-channel TMS 94%
- Influence of fatigue on reaction times and corticospinal excitability during movement preparation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Interhemispheric inhibition between dorsal premotor and primary motor cortices is released during preparation of unimanual but not bimanual movements. 94%
- The recruitment of indirect-waves within primary motor cortex during motor imagery: A directional Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation study 93%
- Can genetic polymorphisms predict response variability to anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex? 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.