Back

Spatiotemporal control of STING activation and saRNA delivery decouples humoral and cellular immunity

Peeler, D. J.; Wang, Z.; Spiga, L.; Jokonya, S.; Thomas, C.; Reumann, D.; Shramko, K.; Rigat Nogareda, L.; McKay, P. F.; Nguyen, D. C.; Briones Orta, M.; Stayton, P. S.; Stevens, M. M.; Shattock, R. J.; Tregoning, J. S.

2026-09-18 immunology
10.64898/2026.09.11.751026 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Self-amplifying mRNA (saRNA) vaccine formulations link the location and timing of antigen expression to innate immune stimulation by both RNA cargo and carrier. We hypothesized that targeting a polymeric STING agonist prodrug (polySTING) to antigen-presenting cells (APCs) independently of saRNA delivery could tune vaccines responses without limiting saRNA expression. By varying the time and location of STING signaling relative to saRNA delivered by muscle-restricted (polyplex, PP) and lymph node-draining (lipid nanoparticle, LNP) saRNA formulations, we studied how spatiotemporal colocalization of type I interferon (IFN-I) and antigen expression impacts innate and adaptive vaccine responses. Co-administering PP + polySTING decreased antigen-specific adaptive type 1 responses by mismatching early lymph node IFN-I and later arriving antigen; this could be reversed by delaying polySTING delivery timing. Conversely, synchronizing early LNP saRNA delivery and polySTING IFN-I in the lymph node boosted saRNA type 1 T cell responses without impacting humoral immunity, which re-directed antigen-intrinsic immune skewing and enhanced protection against pulmonary Acinetobacter baumannii challenge. Collectively, these findings define formulation-specific innate immune responses to saRNA vaccines and establish APC-targeted adjuvants as a strategy to tune saRNA vaccine immunogenicity.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.