Brain-to-brain synchrony during shared reminiscing predicts connection and memory in romantic couples
Park, J.; Emery, L.; Leong, Y. C.
Show abstract
Romantic partners often revisit relationship-defining memories together, reconstructing a shared account of their relationship through conversation. Such shared reminiscing can strengthen interpersonal connection by fostering alignment in thoughts, feelings, and perspectives, an experience known as shared reality. Here, we used functional near-infrared spectroscopy to record brain activity simultaneously from romantic couples during naturalistic, face-to-face conversations. Couples first discussed an unresolved conflict and then jointly recounted their relationship origin story, including how they first met and how their relationship developed. Shared reality decreased following the conflict discussion and returned to baseline levels after the origin story. While recounting their origin story, partners exhibited synchronized activity in the right medial frontopolar cortex, a region implicated in autobiographical memory and reasoning about close others. This synchrony was not observed at rest or during the conflict discussion. Greater medial frontopolar synchrony between partners during the origin story discussion was associated with higher post-conversation shared reality, closeness, and relationship satisfaction, even after accounting for baseline relationship quality. It also predicted better subsequent memory for the conversation, an association that was robust to controlling for the importance and familiarity of the memories being discussed. Together, these findings reveal how the interbrain alignment that emerges during shared reminiscing tracks both the connection partners experience and what they later remember. Our work bridges relationship science and social neuroscience through the naturalistic neuroimaging of live social interaction, and offers a window into the neural processes that accompany mutual understanding, social connection, and sharing memories in romantic relationships.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Negative Affect homogenizes and Positive Affect diversifies Social Memory Consolidation across people 92%
- Temporal Self-Compression: Behavioral and neural evidence that past and future selves are compressed as they move away from the present 92%
- Synchronous Caregiving from Birth to Adulthood Tunes Humans' Social Brain 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Human Dynamic Clamp reveals the fronto-parietal network linking real-time social coordination and cognition 93%
- Alone Again: Altered Activation in the Observation Execution System during Synchronization in High Loneliness Individuals 91%
- Neural Correlates of Social Withdrawal and Preference for Solitude in Adolescence 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.