Back

Self-buckling of undulating flagella: an elastohydrodynamic mechanism for double waves in spermatozoa

Htet, P. H.; Ishimoto, K.

2026-09-16 biophysics
10.64898/2026.09.11.750800 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The relatively long flagella of spermatozoa from insects, birds, and octopuses display double waves, characterized by two superimposed helical waves. The prevalance of these highly organized waveforms across diverse taxa and distinct flagellar architectures hints at shared underlying physics, motivating a model of the flagellum as an elastic filament immersed in a viscous fluid, actively driven by a single set of internal bending moment waves. Simulations of a clamped filament show that it can buckle under its own activity into whirling and flapping states. A multiple-scales analysis of the elastohydrodynamic equations reveals how nonlinear interactions between fast undulations generate an effective compression driving buckling, and connects wave-driven buckling to classical follower-force instabilities. Extending the model to a swimming spermatozoon, the same instability produces double waves. Parameter estimates across species show that most observed double waves lie within the regime where buckling is permitted, supporting self-buckling as a generic physical mechanism for double waves.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Physical Review E
● 112 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
● 235 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.8%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Biophysical Journal
○ 631 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
9.6%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Physical Review Letters
● 47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Physical Review Research
● 49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
Similar papers in this journal
6
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 11%
4.8%
8
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
9
PRX Life
● 42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
10
Soft Matter
● 60 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
11
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
○ 92 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
12
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
● 15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
13
The European Physical Journal Plus
○ 13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
The Journal of Experimental Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
New Journal of Physics
○ 10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.5%
17
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.3%
18
Communications Physics
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
19
The Journal of Chemical Physics
● 56 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
20
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.1%
21
Physical Biology
○ 46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
22
Cytoskeleton
○ 27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
Mathematical Biosciences
○ 49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Molecular Systems Biology
○ 162 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
25
Molecular Biology of the Cell
● 311 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
26
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
○ 29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
27
Nature Physics
○ 45 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
28
PNAS Nexus
◐ 159 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
Journal of Neurophysiology
● 302 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.