Back

Non-invasive quantification of hepatic necrosis from circulating alanine aminotransferase kinetics in acetaminophen-treated mice in vivo

Humphries, C.; Cartwright, J. A.; Aird, R.; Candela, M. E.; Fernando, A. J.; Starkey Lewis, P.; Man, J.; Potter, C.; Scullion, K. M.; Cholewa-Waclaw, J.; Dear, J. W.; Forbes, S. J.

2026-09-16 pharmacology and toxicology
10.64898/2026.09.11.750627 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Histological necrosis is the reference measure of hepatotoxicity but can only be obtained at terminal cull. A time course requires independent cohorts at every timepoint. Circulating alanine aminotransferase (ALT) can be sampled repeatedly in the same animal, and is released in liver injury. We asked whether serial ALT kinetics can be used to estimate histological necrosis in vivo. Forty-five fasted twelve-week-old male C57BL/6J mice received a single intraperitoneal dose of 350 mg/kg acetaminophen (paracetamol). Plasma ALT and microRNA-122 (miR-122) were measured serially from baseline to 48h as cumulative area-under-the-curve (AUC) to cull, against centrilobular necrosis on haematoxylin and eosin sections as reference (range 0 to 59%, mean 32%). A generalised additive model of necrosis on cumulative ALT AUC and time since dosing predicted necrosis with a leave-one-animal-out cross-validated mean absolute error of 7.7% necrotic area (95% CI 5.6 to 10.0; n=49). A panel of traditional regression and machine-learning models all gave equal or larger error, and adding an additional biomarker or regeneration information did not improve prediction. Serial ALT kinetics therefore provide a calibrated, longitudinal measure of hepatic necrosis in vivo and give a more stable estimate of within-group variance for study planning, while supporting reductions in animal use, because one serially-sampled cohort can replace separate cohorts at each timepoint.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.