Atlas of Proteomic Technologies: an evidence-based framework for selecting and combining commercial proteomics platforms
Whelan, C. D.; Smith-Byrne, K.
Show abstract
High-throughput proteomics now spans several technologies that differ in biological breadth, precision, specificity, sensitivity, cost, and method(s) of quantification; however, investigators currently lack an evidence-based framework to select or combine platforms. Here, we present the Atlas of Proteomic Technologies (APT) - a curated resource that evaluates six commercial platforms across ten analytical dimensions using published head-to-head evidence, expert evaluation, and iterative peer review. APT hosts two decision tools: the Help Me Choose tool maps a study's primary aim(s), scale, sample matrix, and technical constraints to a calibrated, weight-adjustable platform ranking, and the Help Me Combine tool ranks complementary platform pairs by their net-new protein coverage and user-specified technical priorities. Both tools were tested exhaustively across all possible combinations and behave in a balanced, merit-based manner. APT is openly accessible at https://aptatlas.org, providing downloadable tool specifications, seeded analysis scripts, and complete protein coverage lists, ensuring every score and recommendation is inspectable and reproducible.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Bridging Simplicity and Depth in Single-Cell Proteomics: A Cost-Effective Workflow and Expanded Framework for Data Evaluation 96%
- Machine learning on large-scale proteomics data identifies tissue- and cell type-specific proteins 94%
- DIA-NN EasyFilter workflow for the fast and user-friendly critical assessment and visualization of DIA-NN proteomics analysis outcome 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Generalizable direct protein sequencing with InstaNexus 96%
- MS-EmpiRe utilizes peptide-level noise distributions for ultra sensitive detection of differentially abundant proteins 94%
- Bayesian Confidence Intervals for Multiplexed Proteomics Integrate Ion-Statistics with Peptide Quantification Concordance 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- An adaptive, continuous-learning framework for clinical decision-making from proteome-wide biofluid data 95%
- Cross-platform Clinical Proteomics using the Charite Open Standard for Plasma Proteomics (OSPP) 95%
- High-throughput chemical proteomics workflow for profiling protein citrullination dynamics 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Monitoring Functional Post-Translational Modifications Using a Data-Driven Proteome Informatic Pipeline 92%
- Parallel Analyses by Mass Spectrometry (MS) and Reverse Phase Protein Array (RPPA) Reveal Complementary Proteomic Profiles in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) Patient Tissues and Cell Cultures 92%
- Performance Characteristics of Zeno Trap Scanning DIA for Sensitive and Quantitative Proteomics at High Throughput 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.