The cytokine structural homologs IL-1β and IL-1Ra have distinct dynamical character that potentially influence their roles in allosteric regulation of the IL-1 receptor.
Torres-Montalvo, G.; Cole, T.; Bishop, A. C.; Lopes, R.; Wand, A. J.
Show abstract
Interleukin-1{beta} (IL-1{beta}) and the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) share the {beta}-trefoil fold, engage the same receptor (IL-1R), but produce opposite biological outcomes. IL-1{beta} recruits the accessory protein IL-1RAcP to initiate inflammatory signaling while IL-1Ra occupies the receptor without supporting co-receptor recruitment. Seeking the origin of this divergence in properties not apparent from static structures, we used solution NMR relaxation to characterize fast internal motion in both proteins. Rigorous treatment of macromolecular tumbling shows both to be nearly maximally triaxial, which admits two near-degenerate axially symmetric solutions. This ambiguity was propagated throughout and found to have negligible impact. Complete replicate data sets from independently prepared IL-1{beta} samples establish the experimental precision directly. Backbone amide and methyl-bearing side chain order parameters are indistinguishable between the two proteins, the latter averaging 0.484 {+/-} 0.030 and 0.486 {+/-} 0.033, indicating essentially equivalent residual conformational entropy. Their spatial distributions are uncorrelated when projected onto the shared fold. Importantly, the difference between the proteins is concentrated at the receptor interface, where methyl probes lying on the IL-1{beta} footprint are considerably more mobile than those of IL-1Ra. It is therefore the agonist, not the antagonist, that presents an anomalously mobile binding surface. IL-1Ra also buries some 16% less surface while ostensibly binding IL-1R more tightly, the signature of an interface predisposed toward productive contact. Conformational entropy can thus distinguish protein function where structure and average flexibility are conserved, and the distinction resides not in how much entropy a protein has but in where it is kept.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Dynamic allostery in substrate binding by human thymidylate synthase 92%
- Interplay of disordered and ordered regions of a human small heat shock protein yields an ensemble of \"quasi-ordered\" states. 92%
- Structural and thermodynamic analyses of the β-to-α transformation in RfaH reveal principles of fold-switching proteins 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Differential local stability governs the metamorphic fold-switch of bacterial virulence factor RfaH 93%
- Mapping Allosteric Rewiring in Viral RNA: Sequence-Encoded Control of Protein Binding Mechanisms 92%
- An integrative characterisation of proline cis and trans conformers in a disordered peptide 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hidden Structural States of Proteins Revealed by Conformer Selection with AlphaFold-NMR 93%
- Molecular Basis of Host-Adaptation Interactions between Influenza Virus Polymerase PB2 Subunit and ANP32A 92%
- The acidic intrinsically disordered region of the inflammatory mediator HMGB1 mediates fuzzy interactions with chemokine CXCL12 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.