Absolute Benefit of Androgen Deprivation Therapy With Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
Aldous, J.; Jackson, W. C.; Chase, E.; Covert, E.; Tang, J.; Singhal, U.; Morgan, T. M.; Spratt, D. E.; Dess, R. T.; Schipper, M. J.
Show abstract
Objectives: To estimate the absolute benefit of adding and prolonging androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to radiation therapy (RT) for men with localized prostate cancer by integrating cancer-specific risk, other-cause mortality (OCM) risk, and relative treatment efficacy. Subjects and Methods: Individualized risks were estimated by integrating cause-specific hazard estimates from a validated staging system (STAR-CAP) with those from a validated non-cancer mortality model (OCCAM). ADT treatment efficacy was then incorporated using published hazard ratio estimates from the MARCAP meta-analysis. Model utility was illustrated using the Prostate, Lung, Colon, and Ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial cohort (n=5468 prostate cancer patients with complete covariates). The primary outcome was the estimated 10-year absolute risk reduction (ARR) in distant metastasis (DM) from adding short-term ADT (STADT) to RT or extending STADT to long term ADT (LTADT). Results: Within PLCO, model estimated risk of DM at 10 years ranged from <1% to 56% under guideline concordant care and OCM risk ranged from 3% to 80% independent of treatment. For patients with NCCN unfavorable intermediate-risk (n=1814), adding STADT to RT reduced estimated 10 year DM risk by a median of 4%, but the ARR estimates for individuals ranged from <1% to almost 15%. Similar variation was seen within NCCN high-risk patients (n=1289) with a median ARR of 9% [Range: 0.4%-17.2%] when prolonging ADT treatment. Moreover, 25% of NCCN unfavorable intermediate-risk patients have less than a 2.4% ARR while 25% of NCCN high-risk patients experience less than a 5% ARR. Conclusion: An integrated model accounting for both prostate cancer aggressiveness and comorbidities demonstrates substantial heterogeneity in the estimated absolute benefit of ADT within conventional risk groups. This approach provides individualized estimates to support treatment discussions; external validation is needed before clinical implementation.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Association Between Artificial Intelligence-Derived Tumor Volume and Oncologic Outcomes for Localized Prostate Cancer Treated with Radiation Therapy 96%
- Use of focal radiotherapy boost for prostate cancer and perceived barriers toward its implementation: a survey 94%
- Clinical Impact of Contouring Variability for Prostate Cancer Tumor Boost 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trial protocol: RadTARGET, a multicenter phase II randomized controlled trial evaluating focal radiotherapy boost with de-intensification of dose to non-suspicious prostate in patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer 94%
- Re-irradiation to the Prostate using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) after initial definitive Radiotherapy – A systematic review and Meta-analysis of recent trials 94%
- Personalized volume-deescalated elective nodal irradiation in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (DeEscO): a study protocol 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Applying a genetic risk score for prostate cancer to men with lower urinary tract symptoms in primary care to predict prostate cancer diagnosis: a cohort study in the UK Biobank 91%
- Bayesian Interim Analysis and Efficiency of Phase III Randomized Trials 88%
- Immortal time bias in older vs younger age groups: a simulation study with application to a population-based cohort of patients with colon cancer 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnostic accuracy and safety of coaxial core-needle biopsy (CNB) system in Oncology patients treated in a specialist cancer centre with prospective validation within clinical trial data 90%
- Digital Spatial Profiling identifies phospho-JNK as a biomarker for early risk stratification of aggressive prostate cancer 90%
- 5hmC-profiles in Puerto Rican Hispanic/Latino men with aggressive prostate cancer 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical Annotations for Prostate Cancer Research: Defining Data Elements, Creating a Reproducible Analytical Pipeline, and Assessing Data Quality 92%
- Mapping Molecular Diversity in Prostate Cancer with a Combined Multiplex IHC and RNA-ISH Assay 91%
- Increased nuclear factor I/B expression in prostate cancer correlates with AR expression 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.