Amplitude without phase: interpersonal movement coordination grades inter-brain coupling
Tasnim, N.; DeLauder, R. M.; Aychman, M.; Moore, Z.; Gahagan, M.; Purevtugs, J.; Newpol, J.; Frank, R.; Grizzell, G.; Nobriga, G.; Rose, S.; Basso, J. C.
Show abstract
Interpersonal movement coordination is a foundational feature of human sociality, scaffolding communication, affiliation, and joint action from infancy onward. Whether this behavioral coupling is accompanied by genuine coupling between brains, rather than one manufactured by shared sensory input or motion artifact, has proven difficult to establish. We recorded dual-brain EEG with synchronized head-mounted accelerometry from participant-partner dyads (16 dyads, 155 dyad-condition recordings) across six conditions grading interpersonal coordination from stillness to fully reciprocal joint movement, using improvisational dance to elicit sustained, naturalistic, gradable coordination. Windowed cross-correlation confirmed graded, partner-specific movement coordination, including a lead-lag signature that reversed with who led. Against a pseudo-dyad surrogate, inter-brain synchrony took one specific form: amplitude-envelope coupling in the high-beta and gamma bands, robust to a leakage-corrected measure, with no phase-based or slow-band coupling. Within dyads, movement synchrony predicted the strength of this amplitude coupling (standardized beta = 0.54 in gamma), an association that strengthened monotonically with frequency, held under a dyad fixed-effects estimator, and was undiminished when the amount of movement was entered into the model. Movement synchrony and inter-brain coupling also co-fluctuated within interactions, above surrogate. Two control analyses excluded the leading alternatives: the coupling was not sensorimotor rhythm-tracking, since corticokinematic coherence was present but non-localized and not movement-selective, and not a shared movement-frequency rhythm linking the brains. These results identify interpersonal movement coordination as an organizing variable for inter-brain coupling and specify that coupling as fast-band amplitude co-modulation, not phase synchrony. Brains couple when bodies coordinate, not when they merely move together.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting social experience from dyadic interaction dynamics: the BallGame, a novel paradigm to study social engagement 91%
- Global Neural Oscillations Underlie Performance Variability and Attentional State Fluctuations in Humans 91%
- Architectural Affordance Impacts Human Sensorimotor Brain Dynamics 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Tracing the neural trajectories of evidence accumulation and motor preparation processes during voluntary decisions 91%
- Probing for Intentions: The Early Readiness Potential does not Reflect Awareness of Motor Preparation 90%
- All spectral frequencies of neural activity reveal semantic representation in the human anterior ventral temporal cortex 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.