A dimensional link between gain-loss economic preferences and psychopathology
Feng, Y.-Y.; Monosov, I. E.
Show abstract
Human decision-makers differ in how they value and trade off reward, risk, and information when evaluating future gains and losses, and these preferences are central to well-being. However, how multi-attribute economic valuation relates to psychopathology remains unclear. Here, 1,954 individuals completed a transdiagnostic symptom battery and a multi-attribute decision-making task that independently manipulated expected reward, reward uncertainty, and non-instrumental information under matched gain and loss contexts. On average, when choosing among gains, participants preferred larger rewards, avoided risk, and sought advance information. When choosing among losses, they still preferred better outcomes and advance information, but less strongly. Their risk preference, by contrast, reversed, from risk-averse to risk-seeking. Substantial individual variability accompanied these population-level context effects, and different patterns of variability were associated with separate dimensions of psychopathology. Anxious-depressive and social withdrawal symptoms were associated with increased reward sensitivity across contexts, whereas compulsive-intrusive symptoms were associated with reduced reward sensitivity. Symptom-related differences in risk and information preferences were not fully explained by a uniform scaling of overall economic sensitivity, revealing additional attribute- and context-specific variation. A data-driven analysis summarized these symptom-preference associations in a single latent dimension that contrasted compulsive-intrusive symptoms with anxious-depressive and social withdrawal symptoms. An independently identified subgroup that strongly sought information about gains but avoided it about losses mirrored this profile and was enriched for compulsive-intrusive symptoms. These findings reveal structured, low-dimensional variation linking multi-attribute decision-making to psychopathology and could support a dimensional, task-based approach to psychiatric nosology.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A computational approach to understanding effort-based decision-making in depression 94%
- Major depression symptom severity associations with willingness to exert effort and patch foraging strategy 94%
- Disentangling heterogeneity of psychosis expression in the general population: sex-specific moderation effects of environmental risk factors on symptom networks 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Selective Increase in OC Symptoms is Driving Information Seeking and Guideline Adherence During the Covid-19 Pandemic 94%
- Delineating and validating higher-order dimensions of psychopathology in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study 93%
- Computational Mechanisms Underlying Multi-Step Planning Deficits in Methamphetamine Use Disorder 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.