Back

Lateralized motor control mechanisms underlie lateralized motor deficits in early Parkinson's Disease

Dexheimer, B.; Selb, C.; Manning, J.; Yaghoubi, N.; Porreca, A.; Barrett, M. J.; Pidcoe, P. E.; Krusienski, D.; Berman, B. D.

2026-09-11 neurology
10.64898/2026.09.09.26362567 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction: Parkinson's Disease (PD) motor features typically begin unilaterally, but it remains unclear whether dominant versus non-dominant side motor symptoms differentially affect lateralized aspects of fine motor control. Methods: We recruited 16 right-handed participants with mild, asymmetric PD (8 primarily left-side affected, 8 primarily right-side affected) and 10 age-matched controls to complete a bimanual tablet task in which one hand draws a stylus to targets (leveraging trajectory control mechanisms) while the other hand simultaneously stabilizes a stylus over a stationary target (leveraging stabilizing control mechanisms). The styli are connected via a resistance band to mimic internal forces that arise during asymmetric, bimanual activities of daily living. Results: Both PD groups demonstrated preserved trajectory control in their dominant hand relative to controls (p > .072), but significantly impaired stabilizing control in their non-dominant hand (p < .022), with the largest deficits observed in the left-side PD group. Trajectory control performance significantly correlated with an overall measure of motor severity (r(14) = .69; p = .004), while stabilizing control did not (p = .56). Discussion: These findings suggest that left- and right-side motor symptoms in early PD produce distinct patterns of functional impairment (rather than simple contralateral analogs) that may be related to underlying lateralized motor control mechanisms. This work highlights a potential gap in standard clinical motor assessments, which may not adequately capture non-dominant side stabilizing deficits in early PD.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.