Back

Polyclonal sensory neuron derivation from iPSCs as an efficient alternative to single clone strategies for pain relevant in vitro models

Neureiter, A.; Ruessmann, L.; Hautvast, P.; van den Braak, N. W. M.; Stoppe, A.; Haeusler, M.; Lischka, A.; Eggermann, K.; Lampert, A.

2026-09-14 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.09.08.750017 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) workflows typically rely on monoclonal cultures, requiring multiple independent cell lines to compensate for clonal variability. This increases workload, cost, and limits scalability for translational applications. Here, we establish polyclonal reprogramming strategies using Sendai virus to generate clonally diverse iPSC cultures already during reprogramming through FACS, MACS, manual selection, or prolonged culture. Both monoclonal and FACS-derived polyclonal cultures reached pluripotency. Reprogramming transgenes were silenced, whereas Sendai virus (SeV) mRNA persisted across passages in both culture types; heat treatment at 38.5C markedly reduced SeV levels. Monoclonal and polyclonal cultures differentiated efficiently into neural crest-like cells and sensory neurons. As a second polyclonal strategy, monoclonal cultures were pooled at day5 of sensory neuron differentiation to generate percentage-controlled progenitor mixtures. TRPA1 protein expression has not been shown reliably in iPS-derived sensory neurons. We hypothesized that increased clonal diversity might facilitate detection of TRPA1 protein expression. Despite rigorous antibody validation, TRPA1 protein expression was detectable only diffusely across the whole cell area. Together, our results show that polyclonal iPSC strategies enable clonally inclusive generation of patient-specific sensory neurons. These workflows reduce early workload and provide a robust foundation for scalable drug-screening and patient-in-a-dish applications.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.