Back

Cfap410a and Cby work together with tissue-specific requirements to build Drosophila ciliary transition zones

Billon, A.; Vieillard, J.; Priya, P.; Desai, M.; Fontaine, E.; De Freitas, S.; Lapart, J.-A.; Mange, A.; Dar, H. A.; Morel, V.; Thomas, J.; Jana, S. C.; Durand, B.

2026-09-10 cell biology
10.64898/2026.09.08.749861 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cilia and flagella perform essential physiological functions in eukaryotes, and defects in these organelles cause several human diseases, including cancer and ciliopathies. The architecture of cilia is highly organized. The ciliary compartment is separated from the cytoplasm by the transition zone (TZ). The severity of ciliopathies linked to TZ assembly defects highlights the TZ's critical role. Although several core conserved complexes are involved in TZ assembly, variations in TZ composition are associated with structurally and functionally diverse cilia. Here, we identify Cfap410a as a novel component of the ciliary TZ in the two Drosophila ciliated tissues, male germ cells and sensory neurons. Cfap410a is one of the two Drosophila paralogs (Cfap410a and Cfap410b) of human CFAP410, whose mutations are associated with axial spondylo-metaphyseal dysplasia, retinitis pigmentosa and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. We show here that Cfap410a is a proximity partner of Cby and that they act cooperatively in the hierarchy of the TZ assembly program by bridging the CEP290 and MKS transition zone modules. Simultaneous loss of Cfap410a and Cby halts ciliary growth by disrupting TZ formation in multiple types of Drosophila ciliated cells, each of which exhibiting varying dependence on these two proteins. Interestingly, the function of Cfap410a and Cfap410b are not functionally redundant, indicating that the two proteins have evolved towards specific functions. In summary, our results propose a novel role for CFAP410a at the TZ and provide an explanation for how deregulation of conserved TZ components could lead to tissue-specific ciliopathies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.