Dynamic Prediction to Predict Virologic Failure in Antiretroviral Treated People Living with HIV: Cohort Analysis of Routine Electronic Health Records Data in the Western Cape, South Africa
Honwana, F.; Mukonda, E.; Gumedze, F.; Hsiao, N.-y.; Myer, L.; Lesosky, M.
Show abstract
Objectives Virologic failure (VF) remains a major challenge in HIV care, particularly in resource-limited settings where timely identification is critical. Dynamic prediction models can provide continuously updated, individual-level risk estimates using longitudinal biomarker data. However, their applicability to routinely collected electronic health record (EHR) data remains poorly understood. We developed and internally validated a dynamic prediction model for VF using routine EHR data from people with HIV (PWH) receiving antiretroviral therapy in South Africa. Methods A joint model (JM) linking a linear mixed-effects model for longitudinal HIV viral load (HIVVL) to a Cox model for time to first VF, adjusted for baseline age group and sex at birth, was developed using routine National Health Laboratory Service data from 122,425 PWH in the Western Cape, South Africa (SA) (January 2008-September 2018), randomly split into development (n = 91,818; 75%) and validation (n = 30,607; 25%) cohorts. Predictive performance was evaluated using time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Brier scores at 12 and 24 months. Results Overall, 12,547 PWH (10.2%) experienced VF. The current value-parameterized model was used and showed moderate discrimination (AUC: 0.69 and 0.73) and good calibration (Brier scores: 0.033 and 0.051) at 12 and 24 months. Dynamic predictions updated meaningfully at each visit, demonstrating potential to flag individuals at elevated VF risk for timely clinical intervention. Conclusions Dynamic prediction models hold genuine promises to support personalized, timely clinical decision-making for PWH. However, EHR data with sparse measurements, missing clinical covariates, and irregular follow-up limit discriminative performance despite adequate calibration, demonstrating that data quality and covariate availability are at least as consequential as modelling strategy in real-world prediction settings.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning to identify socio-behavioural predictors of HIV positivity in East and Southern Africa 94%
- The Risks and Benefits of Providing HIV Services during the COVID-19 Pandemic 94%
- Virologic outcomes on dolutegravir-, atazanavir-, or efavirenz-based ART in urban Zimbabwe: A longitudinal study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of undetectable viral load to improve survey estimates of known HIV-positive status and antiretroviral treatment coverage 94%
- National HIV testing and diagnosis coverage in sub-Saharan Africa: a new modeling tool for estimating the \"first 90\" from program and survey data 94%
- Urine tenofovir and dried blood spot tenofovir diphosphate concentrations and viraemia in people taking efavirenz and dolutegravir based antiretroviral therapy 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Field performance and cost-effectiveness of a point-of-care triage test for HIV virological failure in Southern Africa 94%
- Trends in CD4 and viral load testing 2005 to 2018: Multi-cohort study of people living with HIV in Southern Africa 94%
- Preventing tuberculosis with community-based care in an HIV-endemic setting: a modeling analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differentiated HIV Service Delivery vs Conventional Care: Tuberculosis Preventive Therapy Outcomes for People Living with HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa 95%
- Quantifying delay in first contact with HIV programs among young women engaged in sex work in Mombasa, Kenya: a time-to-event analysis 93%
- Guidance for triangulating data and estimates of HIV prevalence among pregnant women and coverage of PMTCT using the Spectrum AIDS Impact Module 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.