Back

Conserved microglial programmes, non-transferable classifiers: boundaries of the single-cell TBI molecular clock

Gao, R.; Yan, Q.; Zhang, L.; Xu, X.; Qian, X.; Li, M.; Zhang, Y.

2026-09-14 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.09.07.749982 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) pathology evolves over hours to months, and molecular staging could complement clinical and imaging-based assessment. Single-cell transcriptomics captures cell-type-resolved temporal programs, but whether a transcriptional "molecular clock" trained on one injury model can be transferred to others remains unknown. Methods: We compiled four public mouse TBI single-cell/single-nucleus datasets spanning two injury models - controlled cortical impact (GSE277487; CEREBRI) and fluid percussion injury (GSE160763) - plus an independent mild-FPI cohort reserved for validation (GSE247339), totalling 307,991 cells across four pathological stages (control, acute, subacute, chronic). Classifiers were evaluated at cell and sample levels (held-out libraries) against a permutation null, with per-cell-type, strict leave-one-dataset-out (LODO) generalization, glial-only transfer and gene-level SHAP analyses. Results: Within GSE277487, sample-level balanced accuracy reached 0.67 (permutation null 0.32 +/- 0.09; p = 0.001), and the signal was reproduced in the independent mild-FPI cohort (0.40 vs null 0.19 +/- 0.05; p = 0.0010). Cell-level cross-validation overestimated performance by ~0.16, quantifying within-sample leakage. Cross-dataset generalization was poor (strict LODO balanced accuracy 0.20-0.31); the acute immediate-early response was untransferable (recall 0.002) and 80% of chronic (6-month) cells were assigned to the subacute class. Glial-only models raised subacute recall across models (0.91 and 0.75), but precision was indistinguishable from a subacute-only classifier (0.51 vs 0.50; 0.58 vs 0.58) and one-vs-rest AUROC was at or below chance (0.38-0.54) across four classifier families - classifier collapse, not transferable discrimination. The reproducible cross-model component was instead a gene-expression programme: a microglial complement/lysosomal damage programme (Trem2-Apoe axis) was up-regulated across the severe CCI and FPI models (13/13 concordant genes), whereas the immediate-early module was model-specific. Conclusions: A single-cell molecular clock for TBI staging is feasible within datasets once within-sample leakage is controlled, but it does not transfer across datasets as a classifier: apparent cross-model transfer reflected classifier collapse onto the majority class, and the reproducible cross-model component was a microglial complement/lysosomal gene-expression programme. These findings define the boundaries of cross-dataset time inference in TBI and provide evaluation criteria for claims of transferable single-cell classifiers.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.