Back

An integrated mass spectrometry strategy for quantifying the proteoform diversity of the extensively modified O-glycoprotein Osteopontin

Zouboulis, K. C.; Bennett, J. L.; Daly, L. A.; Burnap, S. A.; Holden, E.; Lutomski, C. A.; Eyers, C. E.; Robinson, C. V.; Struwe, W. B.; Benesch, J. L. P.

2026-09-10 biophysics
10.64898/2026.09.07.749945 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O-glycosylation is among the most abundant and structurally diverse post-translational modifications in eukaryotes, yet its heterogeneity renders O-glycoproteins exceptionally difficult to characterize. To overcome these challenges, we have developed an integrated mass spectrometry (MS) strategy to define the proteoform landscape of O-glycoproteins and applied it to human osteopontin (OPN). OPN is a disease-associated extracellular matrix protein subject to extensive modification. By combining native MS with serial exoglycosidase digestions, we directly resolved truncation, phosphorylation, sulfation, and O-glycosylation of OPN. Matched glycoproteomic analyses, using tailored (glyco)protease combinations, allowed us to quantify glycan heterogeneity inaccessible to conventional trypsin-based approaches or protein-centric methods. We integrated these datasets using forward compositional simulations to infer the intact OPN proteoform distribution and benchmarked the resulting models against an experimental intact-mass distribution obtained by proton-transfer charge-reduction MS. This comparison revealed that bottom-up O-glycoproteomics systematically underestimates the true extent of glycan sialylation, whereas assuming (near-)complete sialylation accurately reproduced the experimental intact OPN mass distribution. Together, these results provide a comprehensive, quantitative view of OPN compositional diversity and demonstrate how intact-protein and peptide-level measurements can be reconciled to resolve highly heterogeneous glycoform populations. The workflow establishes a broadly applicable framework for characterizing extensively O-glycosylated and multiply modified proteins.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.