Back

Embodied Emergence of Temporal Complexity in Finger Tapping: Synaptic and Dopaminergic Control in Cortico-Basal Ganglia Loops

Tigrini, A.; Shimokado, H.; Matsui, K.; Mengarelli, A.; Mobarak, R.; Scattolini, M.; Verdini, F.; Burattini, L.; Nomura, T.

2026-09-10 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.09.07.749738 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Finger tapping is a crucial clinical window into the brain's motor integrity, particularly in Parkinson's disease (PD). Beyond mere rhythmicity, healthy motor output exhibits long-range correlations (LRCs)--a hallmark of temporal complexity and physiological adaptability. However, how this fractal structure emerges from the interplay between neural circuits and physical body dynamics, and why it collapses under dopamine depletion, remains elusive. Here, we present an embodied computational model integrating the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamocortical (CBGT) loop with a physical finger model under intermittent control. We demonstrate that LRC is not stochastic noise, but emerges from the interaction between physical finger dynamics and intermittent, sensory-driven action selection. Our simulations reveal that while unbiased action selection yields random variability, a sensory-driven striatal bias generates robust LRC, demonstrating that motor complexity can be actively driven by neural "synaptic bias" rather than passive body mechanics. Crucially, simulating PD pathology via dopamine reduction disrupts this bias, leading to a loss of complexity and white-noise transitions that recapitulate a key qualitative feature of the fractal breakdown observed in PD. By bridging neuromodulation, biomechanical execution, and macroscopic behavior, this work provides a mechanistic framework for embodied neural information processing and offers a potential digital-twin platform for objective biomonitoring in neurodegenerative disorders.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.