Geographic use and performance of distributed home video-electroencephalography in Australia
Nurse, E. S.; Freestone, D. R.; Foster, E.; Dabscheck, G.; Kwan, P. S.; Cook, M. J.
Show abstract
Objective: To determine the geographic use of a distributed Australian home video-electroencephalography (video-EEG) service and whether diagnostic yield or technical performance varied with remoteness, clinic distance, or area-level socioeconomic disadvantage. Methods: We retrospectively analysed 3,502 home video-EEG studies from 3,457 patients recorded at 24 clinic locations between September 2022 and March 2024. Patient postcodes were linked to the Modified Monash Model (MMM) and the Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage (IRSD). Straight-line distance to the assigned clinic was compared with distance to the nearest public comprehensive epilepsy centre. Modified Poisson and linear models examined event, diagnostic, video, and final-check impedance outcomes. Results: Studies originated from 1,112 postcodes; 854 (24.4%) were regional/rural and 17 (0.5%) remote/very remote. For regional/rural studies, the assigned clinic was a median 59.3 km closer (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.2 km farther to 116.6 km closer) than the public-centre comparator and was closer in 68.0% of studies. Median referral-to-recording time was 33.9 days in regional/rural studies and 25.5 days in metropolitan studies. At least one reported or discovered event occurred in 54.7% of studies. Adjusted analyses showed no evidence that remoteness was associated with poorer event ascertainment, seizure or interictal findings, video observability, or final-check impedance. No clinic-distance or socioeconomic association remained significant after multiplicity correction. Significance: Distributed home video-EEG brought the point of connection closer to many regional/rural recipients without evidence of lower diagnostic yield or poorer technical performance among service recipients. Regional/rural referral-to-recording intervals were longer, and remote/very remote representation was sparse, so comparable access gains in genuinely remote populations remain uncertain.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Can artificial intelligence diagnose seizures based on patients' descriptions? A study of GPT-4 92%
- Underutilization of Syndrome-Specific ICD-10 Codes for Genetic Epilepsies: Implications for Precision Medicine 92%
- Cycles of self-reported seizure likelihood correspond to yield of diagnostic epilepsy monitoring 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-world smartphone data can trace the behavioural impact of epilepsy: A Case study 92%
- The effectiveness of Cenobamate in patients previously treated with Vagus Nerve Stimulation for drug resistant epilepsy 91%
- Thalamohippocampal atrophy in focal epilepsy of unknown cause at the time of diagnosis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- An international study to investigate and optimise the safety of discontinuing valproate in young men and women with epilepsy: protocol 92%
- The use of carbogen for interruption of febrile seizures - the randomized controlled CARDIF trial 90%
- Alternating Hemiplegia Of Childhood: An Electroclinical Study Of Sleep And Hemiplegia 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Global Epilepsy Needs Study (GENS): A mixed-methods, multi-country exploration of the unmet psychosocial and everyday needs of people with epilepsy 92%
- Frequency of and factors associated with antiseizure medication discontinuation discussions and decisions in patients with epilepsy: a multicenter retrospective chart review 92%
- Efficacy of Naloxone in reducing hypoxemia and duration of immobility following focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.