Off the rails: a pilot study of daily clinic volatility in primary care
Apathy, N. C.; Kodali, S.; Presutti, M.; Siegel, N.
Show abstract
Background: In primary care, rising demand and shrinking capacity produce chaotic variability during clinic days, yet this daily "schedule volatility" and its drivers are rarely measured. Objective: To measure primary care physicians' (PCPs') assessments of daily schedule volatility and its contributing factors, and to identify potential electronic health record (EHR)-derived measures to proxy these constructs. Design: Observational pilot study pairing contemporaneous end-of-day text-message (SMS) surveys with matched EHR data. Setting: Five primary care clinics in the University of Maryland Medical System, August to December 2025. Participants: Eight PCPs with at least 50% clinical effort. Measurements: Daily schedule volatility (5-point Likert rating) and contributing factors, collected by SMS after clinic close; four EHR-derived outcome measures (same-day visit closure, cumulated time to chart closure, and the presence and volume of EHR work after 7pm) and 16 contributing-factor measures spanning tardiness, no-shows and cancellations, asynchronous ("InBasket") volume, and schedule structure. PCP-rated volatility was dichotomized (top two "difficult-to-manage" categories vs. others) and compared using bivariate tests. Results: Of 150 surveys, 105 were completed (70% response rate; median response 27 minutes). Difficult-to-manage days were uncommon (14% of days), although patient tardiness, no-shows, long-running visits, and InBasket burden were each reported on >40% of days. Difficult days involved more evening EHR work (55% vs. 19%; p=0.033), higher asynchronous volume (median 13 vs. 4 patient-message encounters; p=0.022), and higher visit volume (median 17 vs. 7; p=0.001). No-shows and same-day cancellations were not associated with volatility. Limitations: Single-system pilot; bivariate, cross-sectional, and hypothesis-generating. Conclusion: PCPs' experience of chaotic clinic days is measurable and appears driven more by asynchronous burden and visit volume than by patient no-shows or tardiness; evening EHR work is a promising scalable proxy. Primary Funding Source: American Medical Association.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of Primary Care Team Configuration on Access and Quality of Care 91%
- An Evaluation of the Vulnerable Physician Workforce in the United States During the Coronavirus Disease-19 Pandemic 88%
- Association of patients’ past misdiagnosis experiences with trust in their current physician: the TRUMP 2 -Net study 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding how the design and implementation of Online Consultations influence primary care outcomes: Systematic review of evidence with recommendations for designers, providers, and researchers 90%
- Characteristics and healthcare use of patients attending virtual walk-in clinics: a cross-sectional analysis 90%
- Distinguishing Admissions Specifically for COVID-19 from Incidental SARS-CoV-2 Admissions: A National Retrospective EHR Study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of the Tool for Advancing Practice Performance, a practice-level survey to assess primary care structures and processes 92%
- Essential Indicators of Quality in Primary Care Settings: An Evidence-Based, Structured, Expert Approach 91%
- Feasibility trial of a new digital training package to enhance primary care practitioners' communication of clinical empathy and realistic optimism 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- What Do Clinicians Edit in Ambient AI-Drafted Clinical Documentation? A Qualitative Content Analysis 91%
- Observer: Creation of a Novel Multimodal Dataset for Outpatient Care Research 91%
- Measure what matters: counts of hospitalized patients are a better metric for health system capacity planning for a reopening 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- General practitioner workforce sustainability to maximise effective and equitable patient care: a realist review 89%
- Primary care transformation in Scotland: a comparison two cross-sectional national surveys of general practitioners’ views in 2018 and 2023 89%
- OpenSAFELY NHS Service Restoration Observatory 1: describing trends and variation in primary care clinical activity for 23.3 million patients in England during the first wave of COVID-19 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.