Back

Off the rails: a pilot study of daily clinic volatility in primary care

Apathy, N. C.; Kodali, S.; Presutti, M.; Siegel, N.

2026-09-08 primary care research
10.64898/2026.09.07.26362447 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: In primary care, rising demand and shrinking capacity produce chaotic variability during clinic days, yet this daily "schedule volatility" and its drivers are rarely measured. Objective: To measure primary care physicians' (PCPs') assessments of daily schedule volatility and its contributing factors, and to identify potential electronic health record (EHR)-derived measures to proxy these constructs. Design: Observational pilot study pairing contemporaneous end-of-day text-message (SMS) surveys with matched EHR data. Setting: Five primary care clinics in the University of Maryland Medical System, August to December 2025. Participants: Eight PCPs with at least 50% clinical effort. Measurements: Daily schedule volatility (5-point Likert rating) and contributing factors, collected by SMS after clinic close; four EHR-derived outcome measures (same-day visit closure, cumulated time to chart closure, and the presence and volume of EHR work after 7pm) and 16 contributing-factor measures spanning tardiness, no-shows and cancellations, asynchronous ("InBasket") volume, and schedule structure. PCP-rated volatility was dichotomized (top two "difficult-to-manage" categories vs. others) and compared using bivariate tests. Results: Of 150 surveys, 105 were completed (70% response rate; median response 27 minutes). Difficult-to-manage days were uncommon (14% of days), although patient tardiness, no-shows, long-running visits, and InBasket burden were each reported on >40% of days. Difficult days involved more evening EHR work (55% vs. 19%; p=0.033), higher asynchronous volume (median 13 vs. 4 patient-message encounters; p=0.022), and higher visit volume (median 17 vs. 7; p=0.001). No-shows and same-day cancellations were not associated with volatility. Limitations: Single-system pilot; bivariate, cross-sectional, and hypothesis-generating. Conclusion: PCPs' experience of chaotic clinic days is measurable and appears driven more by asynchronous burden and visit volume than by patient no-shows or tardiness; evening EHR work is a promising scalable proxy. Primary Funding Source: American Medical Association.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.