Quantitative and sensitive neuroblastoma minimal residual disease detection using extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) breakpoints
Szymansky, A.; Hertwig, F.; Winkler, A.; Chamorro Gonzalez, R.; Helmsauer, K.; Schroeer, A.-M.; Witthauer, M. J.; Karaman, E.; Lodrini, M.; Wuenschel, J.; Wittstruck, N.; Fuchs, S.; Theissen, J.; Hero, B.; Koche, R. P.; Barz, M. J.; Heukamp, L.; Astrahantseff, K.; Schmelz, K.; Hundsdoerfer, P.; Toedling, J.; Eggert, A.; Eckert, C.; Spanjaard, B.; Deubzer, H. E.; Fischer, M.; Henssen, A. G.; Schulte, J. H.
Show abstract
Sensitive detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) remains a major unmet need in high-risk neuroblastoma. MYCN amplification, a hallmark of high-risk disease, typically occurs on extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA), but the potential of ecDNA-associated genomic rearrangements for individualized MRD monitoring has not been fully exploited. Here, we applied neuroblastoma-specific hybrid capture-based panel sequencing to identify patient-unique breakpoints within MYCN amplicons, and used Circle-seq and Nanopore sequencing to resolve the extrachromosomal amplicon structure in representative samples. Analysis of 8 neuroblastoma cell lines and 22 primary tumors identified 69 tumor-specific breakpoints. Those selected for assay development were validated by breakpoint-specific PCR and Sanger sequencing. Breakpoints detected in primary tumors remained detectable at relapse, supporting their stability as MRD markers. Breakpoint-specific real-time quantitative PCR and droplet digital PCR detected these junctions in bone marrow aspirates with high specificity and reached sensitivities down to a tumor DNA fraction of 10^-6. We applied this approach to 53 serial bone marrow aspirates from 14 patients with high-risk neuroblastoma to monitor MRD dynamics, resolving treatment response and molecular persistence. In six samples, breakpoint-positive DNA was detected in bone marrow that was negative by conventional cytology and immunocytology, highlighting the added value of molecular monitoring. Together, these findings establish ecDNA breakpoint-based detection as a strategy for MRD assessment in neuroblastoma, that is, in principle, applicable to any ecDNA-amplified oncogene.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Postoperative Lymphatic Exudate is a Proximal Source of ctDNA and Detects Recurrence in HPV-negative Head and Neck Cancer 90%
- Cell-free urine- and plasma DNA mutational analysis predicts neoadjuvant chemotherapy response and outcome in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer 90%
- Combination Therapies Targeting Alk-Aberrant Neuroblastoma In Preclinical Models. 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lineage-dependence of the neuroblastoma surfaceome defines tumor cell state-dependent and independent immunotherapeutic targets 93%
- Transcriptomic landscape identifies two unrecognized ependymoma subtypes and novel pathways in medulloblastoma 92%
- Optimising biomarkers for accurate ependymoma diagnosis, prognostication and stratification within International Clinical Trials: A BIOMECA study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- IGF2BP1 induces high-risk neuroblastoma and forms a druggable feedforward loop with MYCN promoting 17q oncogene expression 90%
- Structural disruption of BAF chromatin remodeller impairs neuroblastoma metastasis by reverting an invasiveness epigenomic program 89%
- Clonal dynamics shaped by diverse drug-tolerant persister states in melanoma resistance 88%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A CAR RNA FISH assay to study functional and spatial heterogeneity of chimeric antigen receptor T cells in tissue 91%
- Molecular counting enables accurate and precise quantification of methylated ctDNA for tumor-naive cancer therapy response monitoring 90%
- Detection of genomic alterations in breast cancer with circulating tumour DNA sequencing 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.