Back

Facility-based abortion care in India's public health system: 14-year trends, geographic inequalities, and the impact of the 2021 MTP Amendment Act

Mishra, V.; Parihar, K. S.

2026-09-08 public and global health
10.64898/2026.09.06.26362364 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: In 2021, India amended its Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act, expanding gestational limits up to 24 weeks for vulnerable categories and removing the requirement for a second medical opinion up to 20 weeks. We investigated 14-year trends in facility-reported MTPs, geographic access gaps, and whether the 2021 amendment changed late-gestation service provision. Methods: Analysis of monthly district-level HMIS reports, fiscal years 2008-09 to 2021-22. We extracted total facility MTPs, early ([≤]12 weeks) and later (>12 weeks) gestation procedures, post-abortion contraception adoption, and districts reporting zero MTPs. Interrupted time-series models evaluated COVID-19 disruption and post-2021 amendment shifts. Results: Public facilities recorded 8.9 million MTPs over 14 years, with annual totals holding flat at 0.60-0.75 million, representing a small fraction of India's estimated true abortion incidence. Persistent geographic disparities were documented: ~5% of all districts reported zero public facility MTPs annually. Following the September 2021 notification of MTP Amendment Rules, public facilities recorded a rapid 55% surge in >12-week procedures above pre-amendment trends, raising the late-gestation share from 6.9% to 9.7%. Post-abortion contraception provision experienced a deep 50% collapse during the 2020 lockdown that failed to recover through 2022. Conclusion: Routine service records provide the first empirical evidence that the 2021 MTP Amendment Act successfully expanded facility access to later-gestation abortion care. However, flat overall public reporting and persistent zero-reporting district clusters highlight severe lingering supply-side barriers and an unmet need for post-abortion family planning integration.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.