Mesoscale Heterogeneity Shapes Molecular Selectivity and Transport in Biomolecular Condensates
Grigorev, V.; Zhang, Y.
Show abstract
Growing experimental and computational evidence suggests that many condensates exhibit heterogeneous internal organization at mesoscopic length scales. How such mesoscale organization influences client selectivity and transport, however, remains poorly understood. Here, we use coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations to compare homogeneous and heterogeneous sticker-spacer condensates with matched scaffold density, sticker fraction, and sticker-sticker interaction strength. We find that the two condensates exhibit markedly different client partitioning profiles and transport dynamics. In the heterogeneous condensate, clients sample distinct local microenvironments in a size-dependent manner, leading to pronounced differences in their transfer free energy compared with the homogeneous condensate. The heterogeneous internal organization also generates local environments with different mobilities and constraints, giving rise to transient subdiffusion and non-Gaussian displacement distributions in client motion. Our results identify mesoscale organization as an important physical factor controlling both molecular selectivity and transport in biomolecular condensates, with implications for the biochemical functions of both natural and engineered systems.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Mechanochemical feedback between confinement and actin crosslinking drives the shape dynamics of liquid-like droplets 96%
- Competition between protein-RNA clustering and phase separation drives re-entrant phase behavior of hnRNPA1 96%
- Molecular simulations of enzymatic phosphorylation of disordered proteins and their condensates 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.