CAMOR and specific oncogene-driven lncRNAs mediate carcinogenic functions downstream of MYC, mutant KRAS, and mutant TP53
Grzes, M.; Jaiswar, A.; Kazmierczak, W.; Olesinski, T.; Nowak-Niezgoda, M.; Walerych, D.
Show abstract
Purpose Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are important regulators of tumor biology, but their dependence on major oncogenic drivers and cancer specificity remain poorly characterized. We aimed to identify lncRNAs regulated by MYC, mutant KRAS, and mutant TP53 across colorectal, lung, and pancreatic cancer and to determine their functional relevance and molecular mechanism. Methods We performed an integrative analysis of lncRNA expression profiles driven by MYC, mutant KRAS, and mutant TP53 across colorectal, lung, and pancreatic cancer cell lines. Candidate lncRNAs were functionally characterized using assays of cancer cell viability, migration, and clonogenicity. Expression in patient-derived tumor and normal tissues and downstream molecular pathways were investigated. Results MYC was associated with the most extensive lncRNA regulation, with expression patterns largely independent of tissue origin. MYC-dependent LINC00997 and the previously uncharacterized AC104447.1, as well as specifically KRAS-dependent RAKRAR (RASSF3 antisense KRAS regulated lncRNA) promoted cancer cell viability, migration, and clonogenicity. LINC00997 and AC104447.1 expression was elevated in specific tumor types compared to normal tissues. We identified CAMOR (CARNMT1 Antisense Multiple-Oncoprotein Regulated lncRNA), a pan-cancer lncRNA upregulated by all three oncogenic drivers. CAMOR promoted viability and migration specifically in cancer cells across analyzed cell lines and tumor types. Mechanistically, CAMOR and neighboring CARNMT1 form a negative feedback regulatory loop affecting CAMOR oncogenic activity. Distinct downstream gene expression signatures suggested that the studied lncRNAs act through different regulatory processes. Conclusion Our findings expand the repertoire of oncogenic lncRNAs and demonstrate that integrating multiple oncogenic contexts enables identification of both driver-specific and broadly acting lncRNAs, providing a framework for identifying lncRNAs that may contribute to cancer development and represent potential diagnostic or therapeutic targets.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Silencing of ANKRD12 circRNA induces molecular and functional changes associated with invasive phenotypes 93%
- An integrative pan-cancer investigation reveals common genetic and transcriptional alterations of AMPK pathway genes as important predictors of clinical outcomes across major cancer types 93%
- Novel significant stage-specific differentially expressed genes in liver hepatocellular carcinoma 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- ELAPOR1 induces the classical/progenitor subtype and contributes to reduced disease aggressiveness through metabolic reprogramming in pancreatic cancer 90%
- Prediction of Colorectal Cancer Risk Based on Profiling with Common Genetic Variants 90%
- Adversary of DNA integrity: a long non-coding RNA stimulates driver oncogenic chromosomal rearrangement in human thyroid cells 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cell type specific long non-coding RNA targets identified by integrative analysis of single-cell and bulk colorectal cancer transcriptomes 92%
- Clustering of RNA co-expression network identifies novel long non-coding RNA biomarkers in squamous cell carcinoma 92%
- Multi-omic signatures identify pan-cancer classes of tumors beyond tissue of origin. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Targeting FGFR4 Abrogates HNF1A-driven Metastasis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma 90%
- A nuclear function for an oncogenic microRNA as a modulator of snRNA and splicing 89%
- IGF2BP1 induces high-risk neuroblastoma and forms a druggable feedforward loop with MYCN promoting 17q oncogene expression 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.