Back

Type II topoisomerase substrate geometry revealed through combined experiment and computation.

Prajapati, M. N.; Seol, Y.; Silver, J.; Desai, P. R.; Das, S.; Neuman, K. C.

2026-09-08 biophysics
10.64898/2026.09.04.749274 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Type II topoisomerases (topo IIs) are essential enzymes that regulate DNA topology through a strand-passage mechanism in which a duplex DNA (transfer-segment) is passed through a transiently cleaved second duplex DNA (gate-segment). Biochemical and structural approaches have revealed critical details of the binding and cleavage of the gate-segment DNA. However, capture of the transfer-segment DNA has proven more difficult to resolve due to the transient nature of the interaction. Nonetheless, selection of the transfer segment with a specific conformation or orientation relative to the gate segment is predicted to govern aspects of topo II activity, including chiral discrimination and the ability to reduce topological complexity below equilibrium. To determine the conformation and orientation of the transfer-segment relative to the gate segment, we combined experimental single-molecule measurements of topo II unlinking a single DNA crossing with Brownian dynamics simulations of the DNA crossing. By correlating the unlinking rate with the geometric features of the DNA crossing, we obtain the complete three-dimensional preferred crossing geometry for strand passage. Strikingly, the preferred crossing geometries for Escherichia coli topoisomerase IV and Methanosarcina mazei topoisomerase VI are distinct and provide structural models of the DNA synapse selected for strand passage along with a mechanistic basis for their differing activities and biological functions. The approach we develop is generalizable, providing unique insights into the kinetic selection of DNA synapse structure.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.