Association of Age With Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy and Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling
Hwang, I.-C.; Park, J.; Bae, N. Y.; Lim, J.; Kwak, S.; Park, M.; Choi, H.-M.; Park, J.-B.; Yoon, Y. E.; Lee, S.-P.; Kim, Y.-J.; Cho, G.-Y.; Kim, H.-K.
Show abstract
Background: Comprehensive guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) remains underused in older patients with HFrEF, but whether the potential for treatment-associated myocardial recovery is preserved with advancing age remains uncertain. Objectives: To characterize age-related GDMT gaps and determine whether GDMT intensity is associated with left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling across age and subsequent outcomes. Methods: We studied 1,795 patients with HFrEF receiving angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI)-based therapy in the multicenter STRATS-HF-ARNI registry. GDMT intensity was defined by the number of foundational therapies used during the first year after ARNI initiation. Serial LV remodeling and subsequent death or HF hospitalization were evaluated using multivariable models and a 1-year landmark analysis. Results: Triple/quadruple GDMT was achieved in 59.1%, 50.8%, 53.4%, and 43.0% of patients aged <60, 60-69, 70-79, and [≥]80 years, respectively (P<0.001). Older age and renal dysfunction independently predicted less comprehensive GDMT. Each additional GDMT pillar was associated with greater improvements in LVEF (+1.23 percentage points; P=0.012) and LV global longitudinal strain (+0.32 percentage points; P=0.049) and greater reductions in LV volumes. Substantial remodeling remained evident at advanced age. Greater LV reverse remodeling predicted lower subsequent risk, and exploratory bootstrap analyses supported significant indirect associations between greater GDMT intensity and lower risk through all four LV remodeling measures. Conclusions: Older patients received less comprehensive GDMT despite preserved potential for LV reverse remodeling. Greater GDMT intensity was associated with greater myocardial recovery, which may represent a pathway to better prognosis. These findings support intensive GDMT implementation in older patients when clinically tolerated.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Hypoferremia reduces long-term risk of major adverse cardiovascular events after STEMI by averting the myocardial reactive iron storm 93%
- Right Ventricular Dysfunction: An Overlooked Predictor of Sudden Cardiac Death and Arrhythmic Events -- A Meta-Analysis 93%
- Clinical presentation, disease course and outcome of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients with and without pre-existing cardiac disease – a cohort study across sixteen countries 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- An International Longitudinal Natural History Study of Danon Disease Patients: Unique Cardiac Trajectories Identified Based on Sex and Heart Failure Outcomes 94%
- Development and validation of imaging-free myocardial fibrosis prediction models, association with outcomes, and sample size estimation for phase 3 trials 93%
- High Variability of Body Mass Index Independently Associated with Incident Heart Failure 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiple Biomarkers to Predict Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions 94%
- Sex Differences in Pulmonary Hypertension and Associated Right Ventricular Dysfunction 94%
- Prognostic value of compact myocardial thinning in patients with left ventricular non-compaction 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Advanced ECG heart age estimation applicable to both sinus and non-sinus rhythm associates with cardiovascular risk, cardiovascular morbidity, and survival 94%
- Development and Validation of a parsimonious AI-Based Risk Score for Mortality in Heart Failure: A UK cohort study 93%
- Development and Multinational Validation of an Ensemble Deep Learning Algorithm for Detecting and Predicting Structural Heart Disease Using Noisy Single-lead Electrocardiograms 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.