Back

Executive Dysfunctions In The Eaat3 Overexpressing Mouse Model Of Compulsive Behavior

Henriquez-Belmar, F.; Churruca-Munoz, M.; Plaza-Briceno, W.; Acevedo-Hernandez, P.; Cossio, M. J.; Chavez, A. E.; casanova, j. p.; Moya, P. R.

2026-09-08 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.09.03.749220 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Executive functions are a set of cognitive processes that regulate behavior and adapt responses to changing demands. Impairments in these processes are common in various neuropsychiatric conditions, including obsessive-compulsive disorder. Mice overexpressing the neuronal glutamate transporter EAAT3 in the forebrain (EAAT3glo/CaMKII) exhibit increased compulsive behaviors and synaptic alterations relevant to OCD. However, whether EAAT3 overexpression affects executive functioning across multiple cognitive domains has not been studied. Using operant conditioning and visuospatial learning tasks, we evaluated the performance of EAAT3glo/CaMKII mice across three behavioral domains commonly associated with executive function: cognitive flexibility, working memory, and inhibitory control. EAAT3glo/CaMKII mice showed impaired cognitive flexibility in both operant extinction and reversal learning. EAAT3glo/CaMKII mice also failed to acquire the Trial-unique, delayed nonmatching-to-location task, suggesting impaired working memory, and showed increased impulsivity in the five-choice serial reaction time task, as evidenced by elevated premature responses. Perseverative responses, response accuracy, and attentional performance were unaffected in EAAT3glo/CaMKII mice. Collectively, these findings suggest that EAAT3 overexpression in forebrain neurons is associated with a cognitive profile characterized by difficulties in flexibility and task acquisition, alongside increased impulsivity, while attentional performance and motivational measures remain intact in a model of compulsive behavior.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.