TCRdenoise - an unsupervised similarity-based approach for denoising of TCR-pMHC specificity data
Lund, J. M.; Deleuran, S. N.; Nielsen, M.
Show abstract
Public repositories of T cell receptor (TCR)-peptide-MHC (pMHC) interactions constitute a critical resource for studying adaptive immunity and developing predictive models of TCR specificity. However, recent evidence suggests that a substantial fraction of reported TCR-pMHC interactions may be incorrectly annotated, limiting the quality of downstream analyses and machine learning applications. Here, we present an unsupervised sequence similarity-based framework for denoising peptide-specific TCR repertoires. The method combines pairwise TCR similarity metrics derived from TCRbase and TCRdist3 with hierarchical clustering and a novel adaptation of the silhouette score designed to address the prevalence of singleton clusters and highly imbalanced cluster structures. By incorporating a pseudo-cluster containing singleton and background TCRs, and by optimising both clustering distance thresholds and minimum cluster-size criteria, the proposed approach identifies TCRs likely to represent true antigen-specific binders while filtering putative noise. Using experimentally validated repertoires from TCRvdb, we demonstrate that the modified silhouette score closely tracks clustering solutions that maximise separation between binding and non-binding TCRs, achieving strong agreement with independent validation based on the Matthews correlation coefficient. Extension to a large collection of peptide-specific TCR data revealed a strong negative correlation between the percentage of TCRs classified as noise and the predictive performance of peptide-specific binding models. Further, the denoising classification labels on this data set were corroborated using structural modeling confidence scores of the peptide-TCR interface extracted from a refined AlphaFold 3 modeling pipeline. Additionally, retraining NetTCR on denoised data improved internal cross-validated performance compared with models trained on the full data set, whereas models trained exclusively on TCRs classified as noise performed close to random. Together, these results demonstrate that sequence similarity-based denoising can effectively enrich for biologically meaningful TCR-pMHC interactions and improve the quality of training data for predictive immunological models. The proposed framework provides a scalable strategy for improving the reliability of public TCR databases and facilitating the development of more accurate TCR specificity prediction methods.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- An Integrated Approach to the Characterization of Immune Repertoires Using AIMS: An Automated Immune Molecule Separator 95%
- THLANet: A Deep Learning Framework for Predicting TCR-pHLA Binding in Immunotherapy Applications 95%
- Evaluating the utility of amino acid similarity-aware kmers to represent TCR repertoires for classification 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- BERTrand - peptide:TCR binding prediction using Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers augmented with random TCR pairing 95%
- VDJ-Insights: simplifying the annotation of genomic IG and TCR regions 94%
- EPIC-TRACE: predicting TCR binding to unseen epitopes using attention and contextualized embeddings 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Current challenges for epitope-agnostic TCR interaction prediction and a new perspective derived from image classification 94%
- Benchmarking TCR-pMHC structure prediction: a unified evaluation and CDR3-based functional insights 94%
- DeepImmuno: Deep learning-empowered prediction and generation of immunogenic peptides for T cell immunity 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Interpretable deep learning to uncover the molecular binding patterns determining TCR-epitope interactions 94%
- Guiding a language-model based protein design method towards MHC Class-I immune-visibility profiles for vaccines and therapeutics 93%
- Do Domain-Specific Protein Language Models Outperform General Models on Immunology-Related Tasks? 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.