Development and translational validation of a novel mouse model for allergic rhinitis
Hossenbaccus, L.; Taylor, W. P.; Teimouri Nezhad, S.; Taylor, J. M.; Haird, C.; Liaghat, A.; Hopkins, S. E.; Jeyanathan, V.; Rudolf, T.; Paz, A. J.; Botting, H.; Steacy, L. M.; Chouiali, F.; Walker, T.; Sanz, J.; Garvey, S.; Schinkothe, J.; Ellis, A. K.; Kaufmann, E.
Show abstract
Background: Approximately 30% of the North American population are affected by seasonal or perennial rhinitis. Allergens from cats are common triggers of allergic rhinitis. Importantly, cat allergic rhinitis (cat-AR) is a major risk factor for more severe allergic diseases, including asthma. Current therapies rarely achieve full symptom control and development of novel therapeutics is constrained by the lack of physiologically relevant preclinical models. Objective: Establishment of a clinically-informed mouse model of cat allergen exposure in humans. Methods: Controlled human exposure was performed using airborne natural cat dander (CD) in a validated environmental exposure facility. Nasal immune cells and IgE concentrations in serum and nasal samples were assessed. In mice, we established a 14-day intermittent intranasal sensitization and challenge protocol using the same CD allergens. Clinical signs in mice were objectively quantified using AI-based video detection. Cellular changes in the nose were assessed with level-specific, spatial resolution. Lastly, systemic sensitization was confirmed through serum IgE and intradermal ear challenge. Measurements and Main Results: Following CD exposure, cat-allergic participants displayed increased nasal symptoms and eosinophil influx. CD-sensitized mice recapitulated key clinical features, including increased nasal rubbing, elevated nasal immune cell infiltration, and systemic sensitization. Importantly, spatial investigation of the cellular changes revealed major changes in the turbinate and olfactory regions of the nose. Conclusions: This novel mouse model provides a translationally valuable platform for investigating local and systemic mechanisms of cat-AR. It will serve for mechanistic and therapeutic evaluations with the goal of improving clinical translation and therapeutic precision.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Accurate determination of house dust mite sensitization in asthma and allergic rhinitis through cytometric detection of Der p 1 and Der p 2 binding on Basophils (CytoBas) 93%
- Dynamic Regulation of CD300b, and CD300f on Myeloid Cells in Oral Immunotherapy 93%
- Personal network inference identifies children at risk of recurrent wheezing and asthma 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sublingual allergen immunotherapy with recombinant dog allergens prevents airway hyperresponsiveness in a model of asthma marked by vigorous TH2 and TH17 cell responses 94%
- Selective targeting of IL-1RAP-dependent eosinophilic inflammation in allergic fungal airway disease 91%
- Epigenetic regulation of epithelial dectin-1 through an IL-33-STAT3 axis in allergic disease 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The dichotomous impacts of semaphorin3E deficiency on exacerbating airway hyperresponsiveness, remodelling, and inflammation in type-2 low and type-2 high asthma models 91%
- Neonatal endotoxin stimulation was associated with long- term innate immune markers and an anti-allergic response in bronchiolar epithelium in spite of allergen challenge 91%
- Quality Of Life, Salivary Cortisol And Atopic Diseases In Young Children 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- An epithelial microRNA upregulates airway IL-25 and TSLP expression in type 2-high asthma via targeting CD39-extracellular ATP axis 90%
- Lack of Kcnn4 improves mucociliary clearance in muco-obstructive lung disease. 89%
- IL-13-programmed airway tuft cells produce PGE2, which promotes CFTR-dependent mucociliary function 87%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.