Back

Human knee osteoarthritis patient-specific cartilage-on-a-chip model captures donor differences to stressors and treatments

Banh, L.; Perera, K.; Lobo, B. R.; Walz, K.; Cheung, K. K.; Chatterjee, R.; Bonnell, E.; Li, K.; Moon, B.-U.; Gandhi, R.; Young, E. W. K.; Viswanathan, S.

2026-09-07 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.09.03.748852 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Knee Osteoarthritis (KOA) is a progressive whole-joint disease without approved disease modifying OA drugs (DMOADs). Effective treatments have been hindered by multiple layers of heterogeneity, including diverse disease etiology and patient-to-patient variability. Here, we present a scalable, KOA patient-derived (PD) cartilage-on-a-chip (CartChip) model integrating end-stage KOA cartilage tissue explants on a microengineered platform that, under mechanical overloading and hyperinflammatory stressors, mimics different KOA etiologies. These stressors drove distinct multivariable model features, including changes in a curated panel of anabolic and catabolic genes, extracellular matrix protein and soluble factors. Exploratory analysis of coordinated model readouts identified stressor-agnostic and -specific KOA disease signatures. Despite using KOA tissue, the model showed improvements to dexamethasone, a symptom-modifying, anti-inflammatory KOA treatment. The model responses to dexamethasone were dependent on both stressor and donor heterogeneity. Exploratory groupings of coordinated model readouts provided proof-of-concept for predicting categories of patient responsiveness to test therapeutics. Annotating patient data provided additional donor-dependent contexts for interpreting model responsiveness. PD-CartChip provides a powerful research platform to potentially surmount the donor and stressor heterogeneity barrier in developing DMOADs.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.