Back

Feasibility & Acceptability of a co-created pragmatic walkability program to promote mobility in older adults with fear of falling: A question of season and mobility profile?

Laliberte, M.; Benabdallah, H.; Lestage, K.; Cloutier, M.-S.; Routhier, F.; Lavalliere, M.; Aubertin-Leheudre, M.

2026-09-08 geriatric medicine
10.64898/2026.09.03.26361963 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Fear of falling may limit mobility in older adults, particularly during winter. Pragmatic, community-based interventions are needed to support safe, sustainable walking. Objective: To assess the feasibility and acceptability of a co-created intervention (MABIDA) promoting utilitarian and recreational walking among older adults. Method: Fifty-two older adults with fear of falling participated in a 12-week group intervention (summer/winter) consisting of one 60-minute supervised walking session/week, incorporating exercises. Walking group level was assessed using a subjective decisional tree. Results: Forty-one participants (73.3{+/-}5.7years) completed the study (dropout: winter only). Retention and adherence exceeded 75%. Intervention settings were considered appropriate ([≥]81%). The decisional tree correctly classified 72% of participants. Participants reported satisfaction (82%) and enjoyment (81%). No differences were observed between seasons or walking groups (p>0.05). Group walking was the main facilitator (59%), while weather was the main barrier (17%). Conclusion: MABIDA appears feasible, acceptable, and adapted across seasons and walking speed profiles.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.