Genetic predictors of clonal contraction and hematologic response in IDH mutant myeloid malignancies
Song, A.; Chen, Y.; Iyer, S.; Fernando, S.; Sudunagunta, V. S.; Stewart, E.; Deng, R.; Scoca, V.; Xu, J. J.; May, B.; Varabyeva, A.; Hsiao, S. J.; Freeman, C.; Mansukhani, M.; Lipsky, A. H.; Lamanna, N.; Rosenblat, T. L.; Kasbekar, M.; Jurcic, J. G.; Chernak, B.; Viny, A. D.
Show abstract
IDH inhibitors promote differentiation and hematological improvement in myeloid malignancies by reversing epigenetic dysregulation. However, molecular predictors of response remain poorly defined. We retrospectively analyzed 79 patients with IDH mutated myeloid malignancies treated with either ivosidenib (IDH1; n=36) or enasidenib (IDH2; n=43). Hematologic benefit was assessed using a composite complete hematologic response (CHR), defined by neutrophil and platelet recovery, and transfusion independence. Targeted sequencing was performed at baseline and at best hematologic response. Associations between co mutations, hematologic response, and treatment duration were evaluated using multivariable models. Overall, 43% of patients achieved CHR, with similar rates between inhibitors. Ivosidenib treated patients achieving CHR demonstrated a significant reduction in IDH1 VAF (p=0.010), which was not observed in enasidenib-treated CHR patients. Within the CHR cohort, ivosidenib patients had a greater reduction in IDH VAF relative to enasidenib patients (mean VAF change -16.74% vs -0.05%, p=0.034). Ivosidenib responders demonstrated a trend toward more durable treatment duration compared with enasidenib responders (p = 0.0908). RUNX1 and BCOR mutations were significantly enriched among patients with incomplete hematologic response and were independently associated with shorter treatment duration after adjustment for clinical factors (RUNX1: HR 2.53, p=0.0024; BCOR: HR 2.31, p=0.0058). IDH1 inhibition was associated with clonal contraction and durable hematologic benefit, a pattern not observed with IDH2 inhibition. Co mutations in RUNX1 and BCOR identified patients unlikely to achieve sustained hematologic improvement, suggesting a secondary block to differentiation. These findings support the integration of mutational and molecular profiling to refine patient selection and guide combinatorial strategies in IDH mutated myeloid malignancies.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators resensitize FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukemia cells with NRAS mutations to FLT3 inhibitors 95%
- Combining LSD1 and JAK-STAT inhibition targets Down syndrome-associated myeloid leukemia at its core 95%
- Clinical Impact of Panel Based Error Corrected Next Generation Sequencing versus Flow Cytometry to Detect Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Monosomy 7/del(7q) Cause Sensitivity to Inhibitors of Nicotinamide Phosphoribosyltransferase in Acute Myeloid Leukemia 95%
- Serum Flt3 ligand is a biomarker of progenitor cell mass and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia 94%
- Molecular mechanisms promoting long-term cytopenia after BCMA CAR-T therapy in Multiple Myeloma 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Expansion, persistence and efficacy of donor memory-like NK cells for the treatment of post-transplant relapse 94%
- CXCL8 secreted by immature granulocytes inhibits wildtype hematopoiesis in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia 92%
- Germline RUNX1 Variation and Predisposition to Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ex Vivo Drug Responses and Molecular Profiles of 597 Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients 94%
- Impact of clonal architecture on clinical course and prognosis in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms 93%
- Distinct Stem Cell Identities Converge into Shared Erythroid Stress in ERCC6L2 Disease and Shwachman-Diamond Syndrome 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.