De novo design of ligand binding proteins using large language models alone
Kim, N. H.; Hatstat, A. K.; Jo, H.; Wu, Y.; DeGrado, W. F.
Show abstract
Protein design has rapidly advanced with the advent of sequence- and structure-based machine learning models. However, reasoned design, which applies physicochemical principles and rules derived from sequence-structure-function relationships, has not seen the same benefits from generative machine learning models. Here, we test the ability of common large language models (LLMs; e.g. Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini) to consider design principles to generate de novo proteins that bind metals and lipophilic small molecules without copying existing sequences. Common LLMs alone are able to 1) generate protein sequences to adopt a desired fold and bind the target ligand and 2) explain the principles that motivate the design choices. Following structure prediction and filtering, we selected a small set of designs (6 to 12 designs per query) for experimental validation, affording metal binders in one round of LLM-based design (25% hit rate) and perfluorooctanoic acid binders in two rounds (25% hit rate in the second round of design). Importantly, the LLMs produce detailed justification to accompany the de novo designed sequences, providing a conceptual framework on which designs can be evaluated. While the successful designs have some deviations from the prompted parameters and LLM-articulated design rationale, these campaigns provide a case study that highlights the utility of LLMs in making protein design more comprehensible and accessible to users without sophisticated design expertise.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Dataset Augmentation Allows Deep Learning-Based Virtual Screening To Better Generalize To Unseen Target Classes, And Highlight Important Binding Interactions 94%
- Cycledesigner Leveraging RFdiffusion and HighFold to Design Cyclic Peptide Binders for Specific Targets 94%
- Prioritizing virtual screening with interpretable interaction fingerprints 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.