Back

Catalytic and inhibitory architecture of comammox ammonia monooxygenase

Mao, T.-Q.; Yang, X.; He, Z.-C.; Yang, J.; Wu, R.; Leung, K. M. Y.; Li, S.; Han, P.; Peng, W.; Li, Z.

2026-09-05 biophysics
10.64898/2026.09.02.748776 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Complete ammonia oxidizers (comammox) are widespread nitrifiers that can dominate ammonia oxidation in diverse environments by efficiently converting ammonia to nitrate within a single cell, yet the molecular basis distinguishing their ammonia monooxygenase (AMO) from those of canonical bacterial AMO remains unresolved. Here we report cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of AMO from the comammox Nitrospira inopinata (NiAMO) in inhibitor-free and allylthiourea (ATU)-bound states at 2.47 and 2.68 angstrom, respectively. NiAMO displays distinctive auxiliary-subunit organization, copper-site configuration and hydrophobic-channel architecture. Integrative molecular dynamics (MD) and quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) calculations support a methyl-plastoquinol (methyl-PQH2)-coupled, CuD-centric catalytic model, with CuC potentially facilitating quinone redox cycling. N. inopinata exhibited broad susceptibility to several known nitrification inhibitors, and ATU-bound NiAMO structure localized the inhibitor to the CuC-CuD region, accompanied by constriction of the hydrophobic channel, which is consistent with the competitive role of ATU demonstrated in recovery assays. Multi-omics analyses further revealed an energy-limited stress response to ATU, including induction of urea transport and utilization systems. Collectively, these findings define a methyl-PQ-linked catalytic and inhibitor-responsive architecture of comammox AMO and establish a mechanistic framework for lineage-aware management of nitrification in natural and engineered ecosystems.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.